Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25901488›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2015

Beyond bar and line graphs: time for a new data presentation paradigm.

Tracey L Weissgerber, Natasa M Milic, Stacey J Winham, Vesna D Garovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 268 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
268citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

268 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Engaging figures.Nature methods · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How to design effective scientific figures.Nature human behaviour · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

208 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tracey L WeissgerberDivision of Nephrology & Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Natasa M MilicDivision of Nephrology & Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America; Department of Biostatistics, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Stacey J WinhamDivision of Biomedical Statistic and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Vesna D GarovicDivision of Nephrology & Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR01AG034676 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A, ST SAUVER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2010 to 2019
$9.5M
Mayo Clinic Interdisciplinary Women's Health Research ProgramK12HD065987 · NICHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KANTARCI, KEJAL · 2010 to 2023
$6.7M
Sex-specific Risk for Vascular Dysfunction and Cognitive DeclineP50AG044170 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MILLER, VIRGINIA M · 2012 to 2017
$6.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135NIA NIH HHS P50 AG044170NIA NIH HHS P-50 AG44170NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034676NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD065987NICHD NIH HHS K12HD065987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Figures in scientific publications are critically important because they often show the data supporting key findings. Our systematic review of research articles published in top physiology journals (n = 703) suggests that, as scientists, we urgently need to change our practices for presenting continuous data in small sample size studies. Papers rarely included scatterplots, box plots, and histograms that allow readers to critically evaluate continuous data. Most papers presented continuous data in bar and line graphs. This is problematic, as many different data distributions can lead to the same bar or line graph. The full data may suggest different conclusions from the summary statistics. We recommend training investigators in data presentation, encouraging a more complete presentation of data, and changing journal editorial policies. Investigators can quickly make univariate scatterplots for small sample size studies using our Excel templates.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalPublishing

Identifiers

PMID25901488
PMCPMC4406565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.