Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25901349›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Costs of testing for ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection compared to mass drug administration for trachoma in the Gambia: application of results from the PRET study.

Emma Harding-Esch, Mireia Jofre-Bonet, Jaskiran K Dhanjal, Sarah Burr, Tansy Edwards, Martin Holland, Ansumana Sillah, Sheila West, Tom Lietman, Jeremy Keenan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotics for trachoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A systematic review of eHealth modes in preventing sexually transmitted infections.Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDS
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Emma Harding-EschLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Public Health England, HIV/STI Department, London, United Kingdom.
Mireia Jofre-BonetDepartment of Economics, City University, London, United Kingdom.
Jaskiran K DhanjalAbacus International, Bicester, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Sarah BurrMRC Laboratories, Fajara, The Gambia.
Tansy EdwardsLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Martin HollandLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Ansumana SillahNational Eye Health Programme, Banjul, The Gambia.
Sheila WestDana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Tom LietmanThe Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jeremy KeenanThe Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
David MabeyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Robin BaileyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBCACI International (United Kingdom) · GBCity, University of London · GBJohns Hopkins University · USMinistry of Health and Social Welfare · GMMRC Unit the Gambia · GMSan Francisco Foundation · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMass drug administration (MDA) treatment of active trachoma with antibiotic is recommended to be initiated in any district where the prevalence of trachoma inflammation, follicular (TF) is ≥ 10% in children aged 1-9 years, and then to continue for at least three annual rounds before resurvey. In The Gambia the PRET study found that discontinuing MDA based on testing a sample of children for ocular Chlamydia trachomatis(Ct) infection after one MDA round had similar effects to continuing MDA for three rounds. Moreover, one round of MDA reduced disease below the 5% TF threshold. We compared the costs of examining a sample of children for TF, and of testing them for Ct, with those of MDA rounds.

methodsThe implementation unit in PRET The Gambia was a census enumeration area (EA) of 600-800 people. Personnel, fuel, equipment, consumables, data entry and supervision costs were collected for census and treatment of a sample of EAs and for the examination, sampling and testing for Ct infection of 100 individuals within them. Programme costs and resource savings from testing and treatment strategies were inferred for the 102 EAs in the study area, and compared.

resultsCensus costs were $103.24 per EA plus initial costs of $108.79. MDA with donated azithromycin cost $227.23 per EA. The mean cost of examining and testing 100 children was $796.90 per EA, with Ct testing kits costing $4.80 per result. A strategy of testing each EA for infection is more expensive than two annual rounds of MDA unless the kit cost is less than $1.38 per result. However stopping or deciding not to initiate treatment in the study area based on testing a sample of EAs for Ct infection (or examining children in a sample of EAs) creates savings relative to further unnecessary treatments.

conclusionResources may be saved by using tests for chlamydial infection or clinical examination to determine that initial or subsequent rounds of MDA for trachoma are unnecessary.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinChildChild, PreschoolChlamydia trachomatisFemaleGambiaHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedTrachomaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID25901349
PMCPMC4406756
OpenAlexW2116005600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.