Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25901276›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2015

Long read nanopore sequencing for detection of

Ron Ammar, Tara A Paton, Dax Torti, Adam Shlien, Gary D Bader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Determination of the DuplicatedJournal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Pharmacogenomic and Statistical Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ron AmmarThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S3E1, Canada.
Tara A PatonThe Centre for Applied Genomics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, M5G0A4, Canada.
Dax TortiThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S3E1, Canada.
Adam ShlienDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto; Program in Genetics and Genome Biology & Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, M5G1X8, Canada.
Gary D BaderThe Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S3E1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haplotypes are often critical for the interpretation of genetic laboratory observations into medically actionable findings. Current massively parallel DNA sequencing technologies produce short sequence reads that are often unable to resolve haplotype information. Phasing short read data typically requires supplemental statistical phasing based on known haplotype structure in the population or parental genotypic data. Here we demonstrate that the MinION nanopore sequencer is capable of producing very long reads to resolve both variants and haplotypes of

Indexed as

DNAhaplotypenanoporepharmacogenomicssequencing

Identifiers

PMID25901276
PMCPMC4392832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.