ArticleFrontiers in zoology2015
Proposal for a revised classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera).
Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 330 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovations in Silicon Transport Shaped the Rise of Biosilicification and Skeletal Evolution in Sponges.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Independent origins of spicules reconcile paleontological and molecular evidence of sponge evolutionary history.Science advances · 2026Article
- Identification and Antimicrobial Potential of Marine Sponges (International journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Exploring depth-related patterns of sponge diversity and abundance in marginal reefs.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Silactins and Structural Diversity of Biosilica in Sponges.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A global dataset of demosponge distribution records.Data in brief · 2024Article
- Novel microsatellite markers suggest significant genetic isolation in the Eastern Pacific sponge Aplysina gerardogreeni.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Sponges (Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida) from New Deep-sea Frontiers in the Southwestern Atlantic: New Species, New Combinations and Taxonomic Remarks on Echinostylinos.Zoological studies · 2024Article
- Whole genome sequence of the deep-sea sponge Geodia barretti (Metazoa, Porifera, Demospongiae).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Elemental composition and material properties of radular teeth in the heterobranch snailEcology and evolution · 2023Article
- Photogrammetry as a promising tool to unveil marine caves' benthic assemblages.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Sponge diversification in marine lakes: Implications for phylogeography and population genomic studies on sponges.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Prioritization of Microorganisms Isolated from the Indian Ocean SpongeMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Terpene biosynthesis in marine sponge animals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Article
- Phylomitogenomics bolsters the high-level classification of Demospongiae (phylum Porifera).PloS one · 2023Article
- The complete mitochondrial genome of the invasive cyanobacteriospongeMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023Article
- New Theonellapeptolides from Indonesian Marine SpongeMarine drugs · 2022Article
- Identification and Current Palaeobiological Understanding of "Keratosa"-Type Nonspicular Demosponge Fossils in Carbonates: With a New Example from the Lowermost Triassic, Armenia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Marine Sponge Endosymbionts: Structural and Functional Specificity of the Microbiome withinMicrobiology spectrum · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDemospongiae is the largest sponge class including 81% of all living sponges with nearly 7,000 species worldwide. Systema Porifera (2002) was the result of a large international collaboration to update the Demospongiae higher taxa classification, essentially based on morphological data. Since then, an increasing number of molecular phylogenetic studies have considerably shaken this taxonomic framework, with numerous polyphyletic groups revealed or confirmed and new clades discovered. And yet, despite a few taxonomical changes, the overall framework of the Systema Porifera classification still stands and is used as it is by the scientific community. This has led to a widening phylogeny/classification gap which creates biases and inconsistencies for the many end-users of this classification and ultimately impedes our understanding of today's marine ecosystems and evolutionary processes. In an attempt to bridge this phylogeny/classification gap, we propose to officially revise the higher taxa Demospongiae classification. DISCUSSION: We propose a revision of the Demospongiae higher taxa classification, essentially based on molecular data of the last ten years. We recommend the use of three subclasses: Verongimorpha, Keratosa and Heteroscleromorpha. We retain seven (Agelasida, Chondrosiida, Dendroceratida, Dictyoceratida, Haplosclerida, Poecilosclerida, Verongiida) of the 13 orders from Systema Porifera. We recommend the abandonment of five order names (Hadromerida, Halichondrida, Halisarcida, lithistids, Verticillitida) and resurrect or upgrade six order names (Axinellida, Merliida, Spongillida, Sphaerocladina, Suberitida, Tetractinellida). Finally, we create seven new orders (Bubarida, Desmacellida, Polymastiida, Scopalinida, Clionaida, Tethyida, Trachycladida). These added to the recently created orders (Biemnida and Chondrillida) make a total of 22 orders in the revised classification. We propose the abandonment of the haplosclerid and poecilosclerid suborders. The family content of each order is also revised. SUMMARY: The deletion of polyphyletic taxa, the use of resurrected or new names for new clades and the proposal of new family groupings will improve the comparability of studies in a wide range of scientific fields using sponges as their object of study. It is envisaged that this will lead to new and more meaningful evolutionary hypotheses for the end-users of the Demospongiae classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.