ArticleStem cells translational medicine2015
DNA damage response in neonatal and adult stromal cells compared with induced pluripotent stem cells.
Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Replication stress causes delayed mitotic entry and chromosome 12 fragility at the ANKS1B large neuronal gene in human induced pluripotent stem cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023Article
- Sirtuin1 meditated modification of Notch1 intracellular domain regulates nucleolar localization and activation of distinct signaling cascades.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- DNA repair fidelity in stem cell maintenance, health, and disease.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2020Review
- Induction of HRR genes and inhibition of DNMT1 is associated with anthracycline anti-tumor antibiotic-tolerant breast carcinoma cells.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2019Article
- Oxidative Damages to Eye Stem Cells, in Response to, Bright and Ultraviolet Light, Their Associated Mechanisms, and Salvage Pathways.Molecular biotechnology · 2019Review
- Keratinocyte stem cells are more resistant to UVA radiation than their direct progeny.PloS one · 2018Article
- Targeting the Cohesive Cluster Phenotype in Chordoma via β1 Integrin Increases Ionizing Radiation Efficacy.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2017Article
- Quantification of Etoposide Hypersensitivity: A Sensitive, Functional Method for Assessing Pluripotent Stem Cell Quality.Stem cells translational medicine · 2017Article
- Pluripotent Stem Cells and DNA Damage Response to Ionizing Radiations.Radiation research · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledComprehensive analyses comparing individual DNA damage response (DDR) of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with neonatal stromal cells with respect to their developmental age are limited. The imperative necessity of providing developmental age-matched cell sources for meaningful toxicological drug safety assessments in replacement of animal-based testing strategies is evident. Here, DDR after radiation or treatment with N-methyl-N-nitrosurea (MNU) was determined in iPSCs compared with neonatal and bone marrow stromal cells. Neonatal and adult stromal cells showed no significant morphologically detectable cytotoxicity following treatment with 1 Gy or 1 mM MNU, whereas iPSCs revealed a much higher sensitivity. Foci analyses revealed an effective DNA repair in stromal cell types and iPSCs, as reflected by a rapid formation and disappearance of phosphorylated ATM and γH2AX foci. Furthermore, quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses revealed the highest basic expression level of DDR and repair-associated genes in iPSCs, followed by neonatal stromal cells and adult stromal cells with the lowest expression levels. In addition, the influence of genotoxic stress prior to and during osteogenic differentiation of neonatal and adult stromal cells was analyzed applying common differentiation procedures. Experiments presented here suggest a developmental age-dependent basic expression level of genes involved in the processing of DNA damage. In addition a differentiation-dependent downregulation of repair genes was observed during osteogenesis. These results strongly support the requirement to provide adequate cell sources for toxicological in vitro drug testing strategies that match to the developmental age and differentiation status of the presumptive target cell of interest. SIGNIFICANCE: The results obtained in this study advance the understanding of DNA damage processing in human neonatal stromal cells as compared with adult stromal cells and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). The data suggest developmental age-dependent differences in DNA damage repair capacity. In iPSCs (closest to embryonic stem cells), the highest expression level of DNA damage response and repair genes was found, followed by neonatal stromal cells and adult stromal cells with the lowest overall expression. In addition, a differentiation-dependent downregulation of repair capacity was observed during osteogenic differentiation in neonatal stromal cells. Notably, the impact of genotoxic stress on osteogenic differentiation depended on the time the genotoxic insult took place and, moreover, was agent-specific. These results strongly support the necessity of offering and establishing adequate cell sources for informative toxicological testing matching to the developmental age and differentiation status of the respective cell of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.