Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25900296›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Pelvic girdle pain 3-6 months after delivery in an unselected cohort of Norwegian women.

Anne Marie Gausel, Inger Kjærmann, Stefan Malmqvist, Ingvild Dalen, Jan Petter Larsen, Inger Økland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Examining the factors influencing postpartum musculoskeletal pain: a thorough analysis of risk factors and pain assessment indices.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Association between sleep disturbance and low back and pelvic pain in 4-month postpartum women: A cross-sectional study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Subjective recovery from pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain the first 6 weeks after delivery: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne Marie GauselThe Norwegian Centre for Movement Disorders, Stavanger University Hospital, P.O. Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway. anne.marie.gausel@sus.no.
Inger KjærmannThe Norwegian Centre for Movement Disorders, Stavanger University Hospital, P.O. Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Stefan MalmqvistThe Norwegian Centre for Movement Disorders, Stavanger University Hospital, P.O. Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Ingvild DalenThe Norwegian Centre for Movement Disorders, Stavanger University Hospital, P.O. Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Jan Petter LarsenThe Norwegian Centre for Movement Disorders, Stavanger University Hospital, P.O. Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Inger ØklandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePersistent pelvic girdle pain (PGP) after delivery is considered uncommon. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of persistent PGP after delivery in an unselected population, its influence on the women's daily life, and potential risk factors.

methodsThe study population was drawn from a previous retrospective study of pelvic pain (PP) during pregnancy. The women were followed until 3-6 months after delivery in a prospective cohort study. All women were contacted by telephone and those with persistent PP were invited to fill in questionnaires and undergo a clinical examination.

results68 of 330 women reported persistent pain in the pelvic area 3-6 months after delivery. 47 underwent a clinical examination, after which 36 women were diagnosed with either PGP alone (n = 25), or PGP combined with low back pain (LBP) (n = 11). Affected women reported a poor subjective health status, but the pain did not have a major impact on their daily life activities. Women with 3 independent risk factors: age ≥30 years, a moderate or high Oswestry Disability Index in pregnancy, and combined PP and LBP during pregnancy, had a 27-fold increased risk for persistent PGP compared with women without these risk factors.

conclusion16 % of women that reported PP during pregnancy were found to have persistent PGP 3-6 months after the delivery. Women with risk factors for persistent PGP should be identified while pregnant, and offered a follow-up examination 3 months after delivery.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsChronic PainCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricDisability EvaluationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth StatusHumansLow Back PainNorwayPelvic Girdle PainPregnancyPuerperal DisordersRetrospective StudiesLow back painPelvic girdle painPelvic painPregnancyRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID25900296
OpenAlexW2018668757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.