Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25900105›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2015

Coverage for high-cost specialty drugs for rheumatoid arthritis in Medicare Part D.

Jinoos Yazdany, R Adams Dudley, Randi Chen, Grace A Lin, Chien-Wen Tseng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Coverage of New Drugs in Medicare Part D.The Milbank quarterly · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinoos YazdanyUniversity of California, San Francisco.
R Adams DudleyUniversity of California, San Francisco, and Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco.
Randi ChenPacific Health Research and Education Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Grace A LinUniversity of California, San Francisco, and Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco.
Chien-Wen TsengPacific Health Research and Education Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii, and University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Mililani.

Funding

Measurement of Decision Quality in Coronary Artery DiseaseK08HS017723 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIN, GRACE · 2010 to 2014
$720k
Evaluating Health Care Quality in Systemic Lupus ErythematosusK23AR060259 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI YAZDANY, JINOOS · 2011 to 2015
$638k
Clinical Implications of Variation Among Medicare FormulariesR03HS016772 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI TSENG, CHIEN-WEN · 2007 to 2008
$96k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS017723AHRQ HHS K08-HS-017723AHRQ HHS R03 HS016772AHRQ HHS R03-HS-016772NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR060259NIAMS NIH HHS K23-AR-060259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMore than 1 in 4 Medicare beneficiaries with rheumatoid arthritis use high-cost biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and spending for these drugs has risen sharply for Medicare Part D. Our aim was to conduct the first systematic, national investigation of how Part D plans cover biologic DMARDs and to determine patients' financial burden under current cost-sharing structures.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of Part D plan formularies (n = 2,737) in 50 states and Washington, DC using the January 2013 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Prescription Drug Plan Formulary and Pharmacy Network Files. We calculated the percentage of plans covering each DMARD as well as the percentage requiring prior authorization and/or coinsurance. We also compared biologic drug coverage in Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans to that in Medicare Part D stand-alone plans.

resultsAll plans covered at least 1 biologic DMARD, but the vast majority required prior authorizations (95%). Nearly all plans (81-100%) required patients to pay a coinsurance percentage (averaging 29.6% of drug costs) rather than a fixed dollar copayment. This translated into mean out-of-pocket costs of $2,712-$2,774 before reaching the catastrophic phase of coverage, during which beneficiaries pay 5% of drug costs. Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans covered more individual biologic DMARDs (55-100%) than did Medicare Part D stand-alone plans (22-100%), but Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans required higher average coinsurance (31.1% versus 29.0%). In contrast, 6 of 9 nonbiologic DMARDs were covered by nearly all plans without prior authorizations at fixed copayments averaging $5-$10/month.

conclusionNationally, nearly all Part D plans cover at least 1 biologic DMARD, but the vast majority require cost sharing sufficiently high to risk significant financial burden to patients.

Indexed as

Drug CostsAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological FactorsCost SharingCross-Sectional StudiesHealth ExpendituresHumansMedicare Part DUnited StatesAntirheumatic AgentsBiological Factors

Identifiers

PMID25900105
PMCPMC4464809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.