ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2015
Coverage for high-cost specialty drugs for rheumatoid arthritis in Medicare Part D.
Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns and Determinants of Time to First DMARD Prescription in US Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Large Electronic Health Record Database.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Coverage Generosity of Novel Antirheumatic Drugs in Medicare Advantage and Stand-Alone Part D Plans.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Financial toxicity among US adults with rheumatic disease and prior cancer: a nationally representative cross-sectional study.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Biologic readiness: Improving tuberculosis screening in an adult allergy and immunology clinic.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Financial Toxicity Associated with Biological Medicines: A Scoping Review.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Rheumatology Care in an Aging World: Global Perspectives on Payment Models and Access for Older Adults.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2026Review
- Analysis of the use of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of Crohn's disease.Antibody therapeutics · 2026Review
- First-line tumor necrosis factor inhibitor versus abatacept treatment choice in real-world patients with anticitrullinated protein antibody- and rheumatoid factor-positive rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Economic Burden of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Iran: A Societal Perspective.Public health challenges · 2025Article
- Association of patient copayment and medication adherence in systemic lupus erythematosus.Lupus science & medicine · 2023Article
- Factors influencing prescribing the first add-on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients initiating methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- A Budget Impact Model of Maintenance Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy with IgPro20 (Hizentra) Relative to Intravenous Immunoglobulin in the United States.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2023Article
- Optimizing Medication Use in Older Adults With Rheumatic Musculoskeletal Diseases: Deprescribing as an Approach When Less May Be More.ACR open rheumatology · 2022Review
- Medicare Advantage coverage restrictions for the costliest physician-administered drugs.The American journal of managed care · 2022Article
- Coverage of New Drugs in Medicare Part D.The Milbank quarterly · 2022Article
- Value of Remission in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Targeted Review.Advances in therapy · 2022Review
- Treatment Satisfaction and Decision-making from the Patient Perspective in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Real-World Data from a Descriptive Cross-sectional Survey Study from the ArthritisPower Registry.ACR open rheumatology · 2022Article
- Socioeconomic Disparities in Functional Status in a National Sample of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Value-Based Healthcare in Rheumatology: Axial Spondyloarthritis and Beyond.Current rheumatology reports · 2021Review
- The Inclusion of Economic Endpoints as Outcomes in Clinical Trials Reported to ClinicalTrials.gov.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMore than 1 in 4 Medicare beneficiaries with rheumatoid arthritis use high-cost biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and spending for these drugs has risen sharply for Medicare Part D. Our aim was to conduct the first systematic, national investigation of how Part D plans cover biologic DMARDs and to determine patients' financial burden under current cost-sharing structures.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of Part D plan formularies (n = 2,737) in 50 states and Washington, DC using the January 2013 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Prescription Drug Plan Formulary and Pharmacy Network Files. We calculated the percentage of plans covering each DMARD as well as the percentage requiring prior authorization and/or coinsurance. We also compared biologic drug coverage in Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans to that in Medicare Part D stand-alone plans.
resultsAll plans covered at least 1 biologic DMARD, but the vast majority required prior authorizations (95%). Nearly all plans (81-100%) required patients to pay a coinsurance percentage (averaging 29.6% of drug costs) rather than a fixed dollar copayment. This translated into mean out-of-pocket costs of $2,712-$2,774 before reaching the catastrophic phase of coverage, during which beneficiaries pay 5% of drug costs. Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans covered more individual biologic DMARDs (55-100%) than did Medicare Part D stand-alone plans (22-100%), but Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans required higher average coinsurance (31.1% versus 29.0%). In contrast, 6 of 9 nonbiologic DMARDs were covered by nearly all plans without prior authorizations at fixed copayments averaging $5-$10/month.
conclusionNationally, nearly all Part D plans cover at least 1 biologic DMARD, but the vast majority require cost sharing sufficiently high to risk significant financial burden to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.