Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25900056›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2015

Ischemic conditioning-induced endogenous brain protection: Applications pre-, per- or post-stroke.

Yuechun Wang, Cesar Reis, Richard Applegate, Gary Stier, Robert Martin, John H Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effect of repeated remote ischemic postconditioning after an ischemic stroke (REPOST): A randomized controlled trial.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuechun WangDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA; Department of Physiology, Jinan University School of Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Cesar ReisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Richard ApplegateDepartment of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Gary StierDepartment of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Robert MartinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
John H ZhangDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA. Electronic address: johnzhang3910@yahoo.com.
Loma Linda University · USLoma Linda University Medical Center · US

Funding

Vascular Biology Core FacilityP01NS082184 · NINDS · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI PEARCE, WILLIAM J. · 2014 to 2018
$6.1M
Mechanisms of Hyperbaric Oxygen Induced Brain ProtectionR01NS043338 · NINDS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI ZHANG, JOHN H · 2004 to 2014
$3.0M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS082184NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS043338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the area of brain injury and neurodegenerative diseases, a plethora of experimental and clinical evidence strongly indicates the promise of therapeutically exploiting the endogenous adaptive system at various levels like triggers, mediators and the end-effectors to stimulate and mobilize intrinsic protective capacities against brain injuries. It is believed that ischemic pre-conditioning and post-conditioning are actually the strongest known interventions to stimulate the innate neuroprotective mechanism to prevent or reverse neurodegenerative diseases including stroke and traumatic brain injury. Recently, studies showed the effectiveness of ischemic per-conditioning in some organs. Therefore the term ischemic conditioning, including all interventions applied pre-, per- and post-ischemia, which spans therapeutic windows in 3 time periods, has recently been broadly accepted by scientific communities. In addition, it is extensively acknowledged that ischemia-mediated protection not only affects the neurons but also all the components of the neurovascular network (consisting of neurons, glial cells, vascular endothelial cells, pericytes, smooth muscle cells, and venule/veins). The concept of cerebroprotection has been widely used in place of neuroprotection. Intensive studies on the cellular signaling pathways involved in ischemic conditioning have improved the mechanistic understanding of tolerance to cerebral ischemia. This has added impetus to exploration for potential pharmacologic mimetics, which could possibly induce and maximize inherent protective capacities. However, most of these studies were performed in rodents, and the efficacy of these mimetics remains to be evaluated in human patients. Several classical signaling pathways involving apoptosis, inflammation, or oxidation have been elaborated in the past decades. Newly characterized mechanisms are emerging with the advances in biotechnology and conceptual renewal. In this review we are going to focus on those recently reported methodological and mechanistic discoveries in the realm of ischemic conditioning. Due to the varied time differences of ischemic conditioning in different animal models and clinical trials, it is important to define optimal timing to achieve the best conditioning induced neuroprotection. This brings not only an opportunity in the treatment of stroke, but challenges as well, as data is just becoming available and the procedures are not yet optimized. The purpose of this review is to shed light on exploiting these ischemic conditioning modalities to protect the cerebrovascular system against diverse injuries and neurodegenerative disorders.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesHumansIschemic PreconditioningStrokeTime FactorsInnate cerebroprotectionIschemiaPerconditioningPostconditioningPreconditioningStroke

Identifiers

PMID25900056
PMCPMC4609591
OpenAlexW2071127679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.