Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25899796›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy use among obstetricians and midwives in Viet Nam.

Anh T Trinh, Christine L Roberts, Amanda J Ampt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Women acceptance of episiotomy procedure before and after receiving educational materials: Pretest posttest study.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anh T TrinhHung Vuong Hospital, 128 Hong Bang Street, Ward 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. trinh.anhhvh@gmail.com.
Christine L RobertsClinical and Population Perinatal Health Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, Building 52, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia. clroberts@med.usyd.edu.au.
Amanda J AmptClinical and Population Perinatal Health Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, Building 52, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia. amanda.ampt@sydney.edu.au.
Royal North Shore Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpisiotomy remains a routine procedure at childbirth in many South-East Asian countries but the reasons for this are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the knowledge of, attitudes towards and experience of episiotomy use among clinicians in Viet Nam.

methodsAll obstetricians and midwives who provide delivery care at Hung Vuong Hospital were surveyed about their practice, knowledge and attitudes towards episiotomy use. Data were analysed using frequency tabulations and contingency table analysis.

results148 (88%) clinicians completed the questionnaire. Fewer obstetricians (52.2%) than midwives (79.7%) thought the current episiotomy rate of 86% was about right (P < 0.01). Most obstetricians (82.6%) and midwives (98.7%) reported performing episiotomies on nulliparous women over 90% of the time. Among multipara, 24.6% of obstetricians reported performing episiotomy less than 60% of the time compared with only 3 (3.8%) midwives (P < 0.01). Aiming to reduce 3rd-4th degree perineal tears was the most commonly reported reason for performing an episiotomy by both obstetricians (76.8%) and midwives (82.3%), and lack of training in how to minimize tears and keep the perineum intact was the mostly commonly reported obstacle (obstetricians 56.5%, midwives 36.7% P = 0.02) to reducing the episiotomy rate.

conclusionAlthough several factors that may impede or facilitate episiotomy practice change were identified by our survey, training and confidence in normal vaginal birth without episiotomy is a priority.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceEpisiotomyFemaleHumansMaleMidwiferyObstetricsPerineumSurveys and QuestionnairesVietnamWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID25899796
PMCPMC4415201
OpenAlexW2073849064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.