Trial reportDiabetologia2015

Effect of atorvastatin on C-reactive protein and benefits for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: analyses from the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Trial.

Sabita S Soedamah-Muthu, Shona J Livingstone, Valentine Charlton-Menys, D John Betteridge, Graham A Hitman, H Andrew W Neil, Weihang Bao, David A DeMicco, Gregory M Preston, John H Fuller and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridFull text readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2015. The graph read 3 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map, but it casts no vote: the report of the main result of NCT00327418 is not on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00327418. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

3numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Ratios

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
Inflammation & biomarkersno clear difference · against placebo · dyslipidemia, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
HR 1.170.94 to 1.45
Stratified by treatment group, there was a weak, non-significant association (HR 1.17 [95% CI 0.94, 1.45]) between baseline CRP (per 1 SD in loge CRP) and incidence of any CVD event in the atorvastatin group only, whereas in the placebo group the HR was 0.95 (95% CI 0.80, 1.13) after adjustment for other covariates beyond age and sex.

Differences

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
-40.00 · no effect
Inflammation & biomarkersfavours the treatment · against placebo · dyslipidemia, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
lowering -32.0-40.0 to -22.0
RESULTS: After 1 year, the atorvastatin arm showed a net CRP lowering of 32% (95% CI -40%, -22%) compared with placebo.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Lipidsdescribes a change within one group, not a comparison · against placebo · dyslipidemia, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
reduced -42.0p < 0.0001
By comparison, atorvastatin reduced LDL-cholesterol levels by 42% (p < 0.0001) from baseline to 1 year.

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Statins×inflammation & biomarkers

Does not voteOpen on the map →What to test next →

7 readable studies in this cell: 2 favour the treatment, 4 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.48contested · 2 families support, 2 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT002899002,340 enrolled · 2006
Δ -0.80-9.60 to 7.50
NCT00728988499 enrolled · 2008
Δ -29.5-216 to 157
NCT0219706520 enrolled · 2014
Δ 13.0

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Statins×lipids

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

38 readable studies in this cell: 26 favour the treatment, 5 find no difference, 7 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 21 families support, 7 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT002899002,340 enrolled · 2006
Δ -13.2-16.8 to -9.60
reduced -66.0-73.0 to -58.0
NCT02546323543 enrolled · 2015
Δ -35.5-40.2 to -30.7
NCT01678820299 enrolled · 2012
Δ 0.50-4.80 to 5.80
NCT01218204287 enrolled · 2010
Δ 5.47-15.7 to 26.7
NCT0093525931 enrolled · 2009
Δ -51.7
reductions -33.6-38.8 to -28.4

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00327418 phase4completed

A Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study of Atorvastatin as Prevention of CHD in High Risk Patients With Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (Collaborative Atorvastatin Study - CARDS)

Ran1997Enrolled2,800Registered outcomes7Posted comparisons0ConditionsAngina, Unstable, Cerebrovascular Accident, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft, Major Coronary EventArmsAtorvastatin
PMID 17065671other papers from this trial
Open the trial in the graph
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of atorvastatin on testosterone levels.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Sabita S Soedamah-MuthuDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Bomenweg 2, P.O. Box 8129, 6700 EV, Wageningen, the Netherlands, sabita.soedamah-muthu@wur.nl.
Shona J Livingstone
Valentine Charlton-Menys
D John Betteridge
Graham A Hitman
H Andrew W Neil
Weihang Bao
David A DeMicco
Gregory M Preston
John H Fuller
Coen D A Stehouwer
Casper G Schalkwijk
Paul N Durrington
Helen M Colhoun
CARDS Investigators
Ninewells Hospital · GBPfizer (United States) · USMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

aims/hypothesisWe investigated whether atorvastatin 10 mg daily lowered C-reactive protein (CRP) and whether the effects of atorvastatin on cardiovascular disease (CVD) varied by achieved levels of CRP and LDL-cholesterol.

methodsCRP levels were measured at baseline and 1 year after randomisation to atorvastatin in 2,322 patients with type 2 diabetes (40-75 years, 69% males) in a secondary analysis of the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study, a randomised placebo-controlled trial. We used Cox regression models to test the effects on subsequent CVD events (n = 147) of CRP and LDL-cholesterol lowering at 1 year.

resultsAfter 1 year, the atorvastatin arm showed a net CRP lowering of 32% (95% CI -40%, -22%) compared with placebo. The CRP response was highly variable, with 45% of those on atorvastatin having no decrease in CRP (median [interquartile range, IQR] per cent change -9.8% [-57%, 115%]). The LDL-cholesterol response was less variable, with a median (IQR) within-person per cent change of -41% (-51%, -31%). Baseline CRP did not predict CVD over 3.8 years of follow-up (HRper SD log 0.89 [95% CI 0.75, 1.06]), whereas baseline LDL-cholesterol predicted CVD (HRper SD 1.21 [95% CI 1.02, 1.44]), as did on-treatment LDL-cholesterol. There was no significant difference in the reduction in CVD by atorvastatin, with above median (HR 0.57) or below median (HR 0.52) change in CRP or change in LDL-cholesterol (HR 0.61 vs 0.50). CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationCRP was not a strong predictor of CVD. Statin efficacy did not vary with achieved CRP despite considerable variability in CRP response. The use of CRP as an indicator of efficacy of statin therapy on CVD risk in patients with type 2 diabetes is not supported by these data. Trial registration NCT00327418.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAtorvastatinCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLC-Reactive ProteinDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedAtorvastatinCholesterol, LDLC-Reactive ProteinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25899452
PMCPMC4472939
OpenAlexW2018646754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.