Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25899251›Full record

SynthesisInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2015

A systematic review and meta-analysis of probiotics for the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Alexander E Zajac, Austin S Adams, Justin H Turner

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Meta-Analysis: Randomized Trials ofFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Nasal administration of a probiotic assemblage in allergic rhinitis: A randomised placebo-controlled crossover trial.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Trial
  8. Nutrients · 2020
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander E ZajacDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Austin S AdamsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Justin H TurnerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI113795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProbiotics have proven beneficial in a number of immune-mediated and allergic diseases. Several human studies have evaluated the efficacy of probiotics in allergic rhinitis; however, evidence for their use has yet to be firmly established. The current systematic review seeks to synthesize the results of available randomized trials.

methodsIn a systematic review and meta-analysis, the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were reviewed and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were extracted based on defined inclusion criteria. The effect of probiotics on Rhinitis Quality of Life (RQLQ) scores, Rhinitis Total Symptom Scores (RTSS), as well as total and antigen-specific serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were evaluated by meta-analysis.

resultsA total of 23 studies with 1919 patients were identified, including 21 double-blind RCTs and 2 randomized crossover studies. Multiple probiotic strains, study populations, and outcome measures were used in individual trials. Seventeen studies showed a significant clinical benefit from the use of probiotics in at least 1 outcome measure when compared to placebo, whereas 6 trials showed no benefit. Among the trials eligible for meta-analysis, the use of probiotics resulted in a significant improvement in RQLQ scores compared to placebo (standard mean difference [SMD] -2.23; p = 0.02). Probiotics had no effect on RTSS (SMD -0.36; p = 0.13) or total IgE levels (SMD 0.01; p = 0.94), although there was a trend toward a reduction in antigen-specific IgE (SMD 0.20; p = 0.06) in the placebo group compared to probiotic.

conclusionProbiotics may be beneficial in improving symptoms and quality of life in patients with allergic rhinitis; however, current evidence remains limited due to study heterogeneity and variable outcome measures. Additional high-quality studies are needed to establish appropriate recommendations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolHumansImmunoglobulin EMiddle AgedProbioticsQuality of LifeRhinitis, AllergicYoung AdultImmunoglobulin Eallergic rhinitisallergyatopylactobacillusmeta-analysisprobioticsrandomized trial

Identifiers

PMID25899251
PMCPMC4725706
OpenAlexW1949939646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.