Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25898928›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2016

Telemedicine uptake among Genetics Professionals in Europe: room for expansion.

Ellen Otten, Erwin Birnie, Anneke M Lucassen, Adelita V Ranchor, Irene M Van Langen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Videoconferencing to deliver genetics services: a systematic review of telegenetics in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Telemedicine - chances and challenges for medical genetics in Germany.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2021
    Article
  7. Experiences from the epicenter: Professional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on genetic counselors in New York.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic counseling during COVID-19 pandemic: Tuscany experience.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Public preferences for communicating personal genomic risk information: a focus group study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ellen OttenDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Erwin BirnieDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anneke M LucassenDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Adelita V RanchorDepartment of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Irene M Van LangenDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today's economic challenges and the changing landscape of clinical genetics are forcing us to consider alternative ways of providing genetic services, to comply with budget limitations and at the same time meeting the demands of increasing patient numbers and patient-centered care delivery. Telegenetics could be an effective and efficient way of counseling, but its use in Europe is not widely reported, nor is there evidence of international collaboration. We conducted an online survey among 929 genetics professionals, to explore the current availability and use of different telegenetics modalities in Europe. Our questionnaire was completed by 104 clinically active European genetics professionals. Telephone genetic counseling was used by 17% of respondents. Videoconferencing facilities were available to 24%, but only 9% of them used these for patient counseling. Various barriers to availability and use were cited, ranging from practical constraints, lack of professional support/knowledge, to lack of perceived suitability and need. The results show that telegenetics modalities are not currently in widespread use by our respondents, in part due to perceived barriers. To meet the changing economic, genetic, and societal circumstances, we recommend consideration of greater integration of telegenetics into regular clinical genetic care, to supplement existing care modalities. Professional cooperation, sharing knowledge, and establishing guidelines on a national and international level could contribute to successful and more widespread implementation of telegenetics. However, the perceived practical and regulatory barriers have to be overcome.

Indexed as

VideoconferencingEuropeGenetic CounselingHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID25898928
PMCPMC4717205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.