ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2016
Simultaneous carotid PET/MR: feasibility and improvement of magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Respiratory motion-corrected quiescent period gating magnetic resonance attenuation correction (Q.MRAC) for enhancing quantitative accuracy in hepatic [18F]FDG PET/MRI: a dual-domain motion compensation study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Attenuation correction for human PET/MRI studies.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Whole-Body Atherosclerosis Imaging by Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: From Mice to Nonhuman Primates.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2020Review
- Feasibility of Deep Learning-Based PET/MR Attenuation Correction in the Pelvis Using Only Diagnostic MR Images.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2018Article
- Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI to Study Atherosclerotic Plaque Microvasculature.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2016Review
- Attenuation Correction for Magnetic Resonance Coils in Combined PET/MR Imaging: A Review.PET clinics · 2016Review
- High-risk plaque features can be detected in non-stenotic carotid plaques of patients with ischaemic stroke classified as cryptogenic using combined (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016Article
- Feasibility of carotid artery PET/MRI in psoriasis patients.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016Article
- Topical issue: multimodality imaging in atherosclerosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016Article
- Imaging of atherosclerosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Errors in quantification of carotid positron emission tomography (PET) in simultaneous PET/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) imaging when not incorporating bone in MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) maps, and possible solutions, remain to be fully explored. In this study, we demonstrated techniques to improve carotid vascular PET/MR quantification by adding a bone tissue compartment to MRAC maps and deriving continuous Dixon-based MRAC (MRACCD) maps. We demonstrated the feasibility of applying ultrashort echo time-based bone segmentation and generation of continuous Dixon MRAC to improve PET quantification on five subjects. We examined four different MRAC maps: system standard PET/MR MRAC map (air, lung, fat, soft tissue) (MRACPET/MR), standard PET/MR MRAC map with bone (air, lung, fat, soft tissue, bone) (MRACPET/MRUTE), MRACCD map (no bone) and continuous Dixon-based MRAC map with bone (MRACCDUTE). The same PET emission data was then reconstructed with each respective MRAC map and a CTAC map (PETPET/MR, PETPET/MRUTE, PETCD, PECDUTE) to assess effects of the different attenuation maps on PET quantification in the carotid arteries and neighboring tissues. Quantitative comparison of MRAC attenuation values for each method compared to CTAC showed small differences in the carotid arteries with UTE-based segmentation of bone included and/or continuous Dixon MRAC; however, there was very good correlation for all methods in the voxel-by-voxel comparison. ROI-based analysis showed a similar trend in the carotid arteries with the lowest correlation to PETCTAC being PETPETMR and the highest correlation to PETCTAC being PETCDUTE. We have demonstrated the feasibility of applying UTE-based segmentation and continuous Dixon MRAC maps to improve carotid PET/MR vascular quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.