Trial reportPloS one2015
Structural brain changes after traditional and robot-assisted multi-domain cognitive training in community-dwelling healthy elderly.
Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01596205 (The Efficacy of Robot Assisted Group Cognitive Training in Elderly Adults Without Cognitive Impairment), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Efficacy of Robot Assisted Group Cognitive Training in Elderly Adults Without Cognitive Impairment
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ageing society and the challenge for social robotics: A systematic review of Socially Assistive Robotics for MCI patients.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Prognostic Factors and Models for Changes in Cognitive Performance After Multi-Domain Cognitive Training in Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Robotic Rehabilitation for Cognitive Training.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Pooled it
- Differential effects of cognitive training modules in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment: A comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Psychology and aging · 2020Pooled it
- Computerised cognitive training for 12 or more weeks for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Psychosocial Health Interventions by Social Robots: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- Computerised cognitive training for preventing dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in midlife.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Emerging Cognitive Intervention Technologies to Meet the Needs of an Aging Population: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2019Pooled it
- Cognitive Interventions for Cognitively Healthy, Mildly Impaired, and Mixed Samples of Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials.Neuropsychology review · 2017Pooled it
- The effect of cognitive-based training for the healthy older people: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of robot-assisted training on cognitive function in post-stroke patients: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Trial
- The Humanoid Robot Sil-Bot in a Cognitive Training Program for Community-Dwelling Elderly People with Mild Cognitive Impairment during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- The role of an educational robot in advance decision learning among community-dwelling older adults.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Neural Plasticity Induced by Working Memory Training: Insights From Cortical Microstructure and Transcriptional Profiles.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- The Underlying Mechanisms of Comorbid Anxiety and Depression Among Young Women: Evidence From Brain Structure and Hormone.Depression and anxiety · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of AI-Powered Solutions in Rehabilitation Process: Recent Improvements and Future Trends.International journal of general medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledThe purpose of this study was to investigate if multi-domain cognitive training, especially robot-assisted training, alters cortical thickness in the brains of elderly participants. A controlled trial was conducted with 85 volunteers without cognitive impairment who were 60 years old or older. Participants were first randomized into two groups. One group consisted of 48 participants who would receive cognitive training and 37 who would not receive training. The cognitive training group was randomly divided into two groups, 24 who received traditional cognitive training and 24 who received robot-assisted cognitive training. The training for both groups consisted of daily 90-min-session, five days a week for a total of 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the changes in cortical thickness. When compared to the control group, both groups who underwent cognitive training demonstrated attenuation of age related cortical thinning in the frontotemporal association cortices. When the robot and the traditional interventions were directly compared, the robot group showed less cortical thinning in the anterior cingulate cortices. Our results suggest that cognitive training can mitigate age-associated structural brain changes in the elderly.
trial registrationClnicalTrials.gov NCT01596205.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.