Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25898288›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry2015

Learning cognitive behavior therapy.

Nicole B Gumport, Joseph J Williams, Allison G Harvey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Patient learning of treatment contents in cognitive therapy.Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry · 2018
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole B GumportDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, 3210 Tolman Hall #1650, Berkeley, CA, 94720-1650, USA. Electronic address: ngumport@berkeley.edu.
Joseph J WilliamsGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: josephjaywilliams@stanford.edu.
Allison G HarveyDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, 3210 Tolman Hall #1650, Berkeley, CA, 94720-1650, USA. Electronic address: aharvey@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · USStanford University · US

Funding

Improving Depression Outcome by Enhancing Memory for Cognitive TherapyR01MH108657 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HARVEY, ALLISON G · 2016 to 2019
$3.0M
Improving Depression Outcome by Enhancing Memory for Cognitive TherapyR34MH094535 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HARVEY, ALLISON G · 2012 to 2014
$813k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108657NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH094535NIMH NIH HHS R34MH094535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesProgress toward establishing treatments for mental disorders has been good, particularly for cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). However, there is considerable room for improvement. The goal of this study was to begin the process of investigating the potential for improving treatment outcome via improving our understanding of learning processes.

methodsIndividuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (N = 20) participated in three computer-delivered CBT lessons for depression. Indices of learning were taken after each lesson, during three phone calls over the week following the lesson, and one week later. These were: (a) whether the participant thought about the lesson, (b) whether the participant applied the lesson, and (c) whether the participant generalized the lesson. Based on a predetermined list of therapy points (i.e., distinct ideas and principles), all participant responses were coded for the number of therapy points they thought about, applied, or generalized following each lesson.

resultsLess than half of the thoughts and applications were accurate. Generalization, but not thoughts nor application, was associated with improved depression scores one week later. LIMITATIONS: The follow up period was only one week later and there was no comparison group so we cannot speak to the long term outcome of these measures or generalize to other mental disorders.

conclusionsThese results point to the importance of improving transfer of learning in CBT and represent a promising first step toward the development of methods to study and optimize learning of CBT so as to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAdultAgedCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleGeneralization, PsychologicalHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedThinkingYoung AdultCognitive behavior therapyDepressionLearning

Identifiers

PMID25898288
PMCPMC4426215
OpenAlexW2088601408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.