Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25897938›Full record

ArticleLab animal2015

Postoperative pain in Sprague Dawley rats after liver biopsy by laparotomy versus laparoscopy.

Liette Préfontaine, Pierre Hélie, Pascal Vachon

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lab animal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Induction of Endometriosis in a Menstruating Mouse Model (Mus musculus): A Translational Animal Disease Model.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liette PréfontaineFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Biomedicine, University of Montreal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
Pierre HélieFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Pathology and Microbiology, University of Montreal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
Pascal VachonFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Biomedicine, University of Montreal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery offers advantages for both animal welfare and quality of experimental data. Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy is associated with less postoperative pain and faster recuperation in humans and is also associated with less postoperative pain in dogs. Postoperative pain associated with laparotomy and laparoscopy has not been compared in rodents, however. The authors used a validated pain grimace scale to evaluate postoperative pain in male Sprague Dawley rats after liver biopsy by laparotomy or laparoscopy. Rats that underwent laparoscopy showed fewer recognized signs of pain than did rats that underwent laparotomy. The authors suggest that laparoscopy could be used for repeated biopsies in rats, minimizing the number of animals used in pharmacological and toxicological studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiopsyFacial ExpressionLaparoscopyLaparotomyLiverMalePain MeasurementPostoperative PainRats, Sprague-DawleyVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID25897938
OpenAlexW2016011221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.