Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25897875›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of neuroscience2015

Plasticity of cortical excitatory-inhibitory balance.

Robert C Froemke

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 245 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
245citing papers in PubMed
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

245 citing papers in PubMed, 494 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Excitatory and inhibitory networks diverge following early blindness.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Distinct cell type-specific mechanisms underlie cognitive dysfunction during persistent integrated stress response activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Homeostatic Plasticity Enables Stable yet Tunable Neuronal Assemblies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

185 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert C FroemkeSkirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, and Departments of Otolaryngology, Neuroscience, and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016; email: robert.froemke@med.nyu.edu.
New York University · US

Funding

Synaptic basis of perceptual learning with cochlear implants in rat auditory cortex - RenewalR01DC012557 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Robert Crooks Froemke, Mario A Svirsky · 2013 to 2026
$7.0M
Synaptic basis of perceptual learning in primary auditory cortexR00DC009635 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FROEMKE, ROBERT CROOKS · 2010 to 2013
$909k
Synaptic basis of perceptual learning in primary auditory cortexK99DC009635 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FROEMKE, ROBERT CROOKS · 2008 to 2009
$141k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC009635NIDCD NIH HHS DC12557NIDCD NIH HHS K99 DC009635NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC009635NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synapses are highly plastic and are modified by changes in patterns of neural activity or sensory experience. Plasticity of cortical excitatory synapses is thought to be important for learning and memory, leading to alterations in sensory representations and cognitive maps. However, these changes must be coordinated across other synapses within local circuits to preserve neural coding schemes and the organization of excitatory and inhibitory inputs, i.e., excitatory-inhibitory balance. Recent studies indicate that inhibitory synapses are also plastic and are controlled directly by a large number of neuromodulators, particularly during episodes of learning. Many modulators transiently alter excitatory-inhibitory balance by decreasing inhibition, and thus disinhibition has emerged as a major mechanism by which neuromodulation might enable long-term synaptic modifications naturally. This review examines the relationships between neuromodulation and synaptic plasticity, focusing on the induction of long-term changes that collectively enhance cortical excitatory-inhibitory balance for improving perception and behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexHumansLearningMemoryNeural InhibitionNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsNeurotransmitter AgentsNeurotransmitter Agentscortexinhibitionneuromodulationsynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID25897875
PMCPMC4652600
OpenAlexW2139936417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.