Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25897842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Selective stimulation of penumbral cones reveals perception in the shadow of retinal blood vessels.

Manuel Spitschan, Geoffrey K Aguirre, David H Brainard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Minimal Mimics and Maps of Natural Light for Mammals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What can the eye see with melanopsin?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Temporal Sensitivity for Achromatic and Chromatic Flicker across the Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Melanopsin contributions to non-visual and visual function.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manuel SpitschanDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Geoffrey K AguirreDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
David H BrainardDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Qi N Cui · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
COLOR CONSTANCY--REAL IMAGES AND EARLY VISUAL MECHANISMSR01EY010016 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BRAINARD, DAVID H. · 1998 to 2018
$5.4M
Cortical Structure and Function in Blindness and following Restored VisionR01EY020516 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AGUIRRE, GEOFFREY KARL · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS 1 R01 EY020516NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010016NEI NIH HHS R01 EY020516NEI NIH HHS R01 EY10016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1819, Johann Purkinje described how a moving light source that displaces the shadow of the retinal blood vessels to adjacent cones can produce the entopic percept of a branching tree. Here, we describe a novel method for producing a similar percept. We used a device that mixes 56 narrowband primaries under computer control, in conjunction with the method of silent substitution, to present observers with a spectral modulation that selectively targeted penumbral cones in the shadow of the retinal blood vessels. Such a modulation elicits a clear Purkinje-tree percept. We show that the percept is specific to penumbral L and M cone stimulation and is not produced by selective penumbral S cone stimulation. The Purkinje-tree percept was strongest at 16 Hz and fell off at lower (8 Hz) and higher (32 Hz) temporal frequencies. Selective stimulation of open-field cones that are not in shadow, with penumbral cones silenced, also produced the percept, but it was not seen when penumbral and open-field cones were modulated together. This indicates the need for spatial contrast between penumbral and open-field cones to create the Purkinje-tree percept. Our observation provides a new means for studying the response of retinally stabilized images and demonstrates that penumbral cones can support spatial vision. Further, the result illustrates a way in which silent substitution techniques can fail to be silent. We show that inadvertent penumbral cone stimulation can accompany melanopsin-directed modulations that are designed only to silence open-field cones. This in turn can result in visual responses that might be mistaken as melanopsin-driven.

Indexed as

AdultColor PerceptionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Vessels

Identifiers

PMID25897842
PMCPMC4405364
OpenAlexW2024791379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.