Trial reportAtherosclerosis2015
The lipid-lowering effects of lomitapide are unaffected by adjunctive apheresis in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia - a post-hoc analysis of a Phase 3, single-arm, open-label trial.
Trial report in Atherosclerosis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Lomitapide in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: A Systematic Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Lomitapide in Japanese Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2017Trial
- Current Options and Future Perspectives in the Treatment of Dyslipidemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Lomitapide and Mipomersen-Inhibiting Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein (MTP) and apoB100 Synthesis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2019Review
- Current Role of Lipoprotein Apheresis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2019Review
- Can Lp(a) Lowering Against Background Statin Therapy Really Reduce Cardiovascular Risk?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2019Review
- Lomitapide: a review of its clinical use, efficacy, and tolerability.Core evidence · 2019Article
- The 1Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2017Review
- Novel Therapies for Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2016Review
- Future Lipid-Altering Therapeutic Options Targeting Residual Cardiovascular Risk.Current cardiology reports · 2016Review
- PCSK9 inhibition: the way forward in the treatment of dyslipidemia.BMC medicine · 2015Review
- Familial hypercholesterolaemia in children and adolescents: gaining decades of life by optimizing detection and treatment.European heart journal · 2015Review
- Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Advances in Recognition and Therapy.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesReview
- Evinacumab Treatment of Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Patients in a Real-World Setting: An Overview After the First Year of Therapy.AACE endocrinology and diabetesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLomitapide (a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor) is an adjunctive treatment for homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH), a rare genetic condition characterised by elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), and premature, severe, accelerated atherosclerosis. Standard of care for HoFH includes lipid-lowering drugs and lipoprotein apheresis. We conducted a post-hoc analysis using data from a Phase 3 study to assess whether concomitant apheresis affected the lipid-lowering efficacy of lomitapide.
methodsExisting lipid-lowering therapy, including apheresis, was to remain stable from Week -6 to Week 26. Lomitapide dose was escalated on the basis of individual safety/tolerability from 5 mg to 60 mg a day (maximum). The primary endpoint was mean percent change in LDL-C from baseline to Week 26 (efficacy phase), after which patients remained on lomitapide through Week 78 for safety assessment and further evaluation of efficacy. During this latter period, apheresis could be adjusted. We analysed the impact of apheresis on LDL-C reductions in patients receiving lomitapide.
resultsOf the 29 patients that entered the efficacy phase, 18 (62%) were receiving apheresis at baseline. Twenty-three patients (13 receiving apheresis) completed the Week 26 evaluation. Of the six patients who discontinued in the first 26 weeks, five were receiving apheresis. There were no significant differences in percent change from baseline of LDL-C at Week 26 in patients treated (-48%) and not treated (-55%) with apheresis (p = 0.545). Changes in Lp(a) levels were modest and not different between groups (p = 0.436).
conclusionThe LDL-C lowering efficacy of lomitapide is unaffected by lipoprotein apheresis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.