Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25897413›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2015

Willingness to use couples HIV testing and discussion of sexual agreements among heterosexuals.

Rob Stephenson, Catherine Finneran, Tamar Goldenberg, Patricia Coury-Doniger, Theresa E Senn, Marguerite Urban, Ann Schwartz, Patrick Sullivan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rob StephensonDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Catherine FinneranDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA.
Tamar GoldenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA.
Patricia Coury-DonigerCenter for Health and Behavioral Training, Infectious Diseases Division, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY USA.
Theresa E SennCenter for Health and Behavioral Training, Infectious Diseases Division, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY USA.
Marguerite UrbanCenter for Health and Behavioral Training, Infectious Diseases Division, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY USA.
Ann SchwartzCenter for Health and Behavioral Training, Infectious Diseases Division, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY USA.
Patrick SullivanDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA.
Emory University · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos del Rio · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
Virology/Immunology CoreP30AI078498 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DEWHURST, STEPHEN · 2008 to 2018
$14.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI078498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC) has been used as an HIV prevention strategy in Africa for over 20 years where the HIV epidemic is largely concentrated among sexually active heterosexuals. In recent years, CHTC has been adapted for men who have sex with men (MSM) in the US. A central element of the CHTC intervention as adapted for male couples in the US is the discussion of sexual agreements by the dyad during the CHTC session. Given the success of CHTC for heterosexual couples in Africa, it seems appropriate that CHTC could also be provided to heterosexual couples in the US. However, little is known about heterosexual's willingness to utilize CHTC services including discussion of sexual agreements. This small, preliminary qualitative study sheds new light on the potential for CHTC adoption among heterosexuals in the US. Four focus groups were conducted with heterosexual men and women attending a publicly-funded STI clinic, to explore the potential feasibility and acceptability of CHTC with heterosexuals. The results are similar to those seen for MSM: high levels of willingness to use CHTC, perceptions of the advantages of using CHTC, and willingness to discuss sexual agreements; all necessary conditions for the successful roll-out of CHTC. Further work is now needed with larger samples of high-risk heterosexuals to more completely understand the typologies of sexual agreements and the common language used for sexual agreements in heterosexual relationships. These early data show great promise that CHTC can achieve the same levels of willingness, fit, and acceptability among heterosexual couples as currently experienced by male couples in the US.

Indexed as

CouplesHeterosexualHIVHIV testingSexual agreements

Identifiers

PMID25897413
PMCPMC4395621
OpenAlexW2007829709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.