Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25897258›Full record

ArticlePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine2015

Immune cell-based screening assay for response to anticancer agents: applications in pharmacogenomics.

Amber Frick, Yuri Fedoriw, Kristy Richards, Blossom Damania, Bethany Parks, Oscar Suzuki, Cristina S Benton, Emmanuel Chan, Russell S Thomas, Tim Wiltshire

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Phenotypical screening on metastatic PRCC-TFE3 fusion translocation renal cell carcinoma organoids reveals potential therapeutic agents.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Amber FrickDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Yuri FedoriwDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kristy RichardsLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA ; Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Blossom DamaniaLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA ; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Bethany ParksThe Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Oscar SuzukiDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Cristina S BentonDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Emmanuel ChanDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Russell S ThomasEnvironmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Tim WiltshireDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA ; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USPediatrics and Genetics · USThe Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

UNC Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000083 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2012 to 2013
$11.6M
Role of KSHV Viral Proteins in Signaling and PathogenesisR01CA096500 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAMANIA, BLOSSOM A · 2002 to 2022
$6.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000083NCI NIH HHS R01 CA096500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterpatient variability in immune and chemotherapeutic cytotoxic responses is likely due to complex genetic differences and is difficult to ascertain in humans. Through the use of a panel of genetically diverse mouse inbred strains, we developed a drug screening platform aimed at examining interstrain differences in viability on normal, noncancerous immune cells following chemotherapeutic cytotoxic insult. Drug effects were investigated by comparing selective chemotherapeutic agents, such as BEZ-235 and selumetinib, against conventional cytotoxic agents targeting multiple pathways, including doxorubicin and idarubicin.

methodsSplenocytes were isolated from 36 isogenic strains of mice using standard procedures. Of note, the splenocytes were not stimulated to avoid attributing responses to pathways involved with cellular stimulation rather than toxicity. Cells were incubated with compounds on a nine-point logarithmic dosing scale ranging from 15 nM to 100 μM (37°C, 5% CO2). At 4 hours posttreatment, cells were labeled with antibodies and physiological indicator dyes and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Cellular phenotypes (eg, viability) were collected and analyzed using flow cytometry. Dose-response curves with response normalized to the zero dose as a function of log concentration were generated using GraphPad Prism 6.

resultsPhenotypes were quantified using flow cytometry, yielding interstrain variation for measured endpoints in different immune cells. The flow cytometry assays produced over 16,000 data points that were used to generate dose-response curves. The more targeted agents, BEZ-235 and selumetinib, were less toxic to immune cells than the anthracycline agents. The calculated heritability for the viability of immune cells was higher with anthracyclines than the novel agents, making them better suited for downstream genetic analysis.

conclusionUsing this approach, we identify cell lines of variable sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents and aim to identify robust, replicable endpoints of cellular response to drugs that provide the starting point for identifying candidate genes and cellular toxicity pathways for future validation in human studies.

Indexed as

chemotherapycytotoxicityimmunomodulationprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID25897258
PMCPMC4397719
OpenAlexW2038516209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.