ArticleBMC cancer2015
Mammographic microcalcifications and breast cancer tumorigenesis: a radiologic-pathologic analysis.
Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contrast-enhanced mammography based quantitative and qualitative feature analysis across different breast cancer molecular subtypes.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Creation and Verification of a Machine Learning-based Model for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk in Patients with BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- Longitudinal contrast-enhanced cone beam breast computed tomography for monitoring treatment response in breast cancer neoadjuvant therapy: a comprehensive assessment.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Mammographic Calcifications in Lung Transplant Recipients: Prevalence and Evolution.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Full Field Digital Mammography Dataset from a Population Screening Program.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Imaging Biomarkers for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Evidence from an Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Radiolabeled HER2-targeted molecular probes in breast cancer imaging: current knowledge and future prospective.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Microcalcifications in breast cancer tissue studied by X-ray absorption, emission, scattering and diffraction.Journal of applied crystallography · 2025Article
- Mammographic Vascular Microcalcifications as a Surrogate Parameter for Coronary Heart Disease: Correlation to Cardiac Computer Tomography and Proposal of a Classification Score.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Digital Mammography (DM) vs. Dynamic Contrast Enhancement-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) in Microcalcifications Assessment: A Radiological-Pathological Comparison.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Case report: Diagnostic trap: metastatic endometrial stromal sarcoma with breast metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Mammographic assessment of breast density as a tool for predicting the response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2024Article
- Clinical and pathological features analysis of invasive breast cancer with microcalcification.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Improved automated early detection of breast cancer based on high resolution 3D micro-CT microcalcification images.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- The perils of generalization: Rethinking breast cancer screening guidelines for young women of color.Cancer · 2021Article
- Predictors of mammographic microcalcifications.International journal of cancer · 2021Article
- Breast Cancer and Microcalcifications: An Osteoimmunological Disorder?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Quantitative chemical imaging of breast calcifications in association with neoplastic processes.Theranostics · 2020Article
- Mammographic casting-type calcification is an independent prognostic factor in invasive breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicrocalcifications (MCs) are tiny deposits of calcium in breast soft tissue. Approximately 30% of early invasive breast cancers have fine, granular MCs detectable on mammography; however, their significance in breast tumorigenesis is controversial. This study had two objectives: (1) to find associations between mammographic MCs and tumor pathology, and (2) to compare the diagnostic value of mammograms and breast biopsies in identifying malignant MCs.
methodsA retrospective chart review was performed for 937 women treated for breast cancer during 2000-2012 at St. Michael's Hospital. Demographic information (age and menopausal status), tumor pathology (size, histology, grade, nodal status and lymphovascular invasion), hormonal status (ER and PR), HER-2 over-expression and presence of MCs were collected. Chi-square tests were performed for categorical variables and t-tests were performed for continuous variables. All p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
resultsA total of 937 patient charts were included. About 38.3% of the patients presented with mammographic MCs on routine mammographic screening. Patients were more likely to have MCs if they were HER-2 positive (52.9%; p < 0.001). There was a significant association between MCs and peri-menopausal status with a mean age of 50 (64%; p = 0.012). Patients with invasive ductal carcinomas (40.9%; p = 0.001) were more likely to present with MCs than were patients with other tumor histologies. Patients with a heterogeneous breast density (p = 0.031) and multifocal breast disease (p = 0.044) were more likely to have MCs on mammograms. There was a positive correlation between MCs and tumor grade (p = 0.057), with grade III tumors presenting with the most MCs (41.3%). A total of 52.2% of MCs were missed on mammograms which were visible on pathology (p < 0.001).
conclusionThis is the largest study suggesting the appearance of MCs on mammograms is strongly associated with HER-2 over-expression, invasive ductal carcinomas, peri-menopausal status, heterogeneous breast density and multifocal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.