ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015
Optimization of polyene-azole combination therapy against aspergillosis using an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Outcomes of Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion as Salvage Therapy for Invasive Fungal Disease.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Case Report:Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- In Vitro Activity of Isavuconazole and Amphotericin B in Association against Mucorales.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation of Posaconazole-Amphotericin B Combination againstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Challenges in the Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis in Immunocompromised Children.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Review
- Activity of Amphotericin B Formulations and Voriconazole, Alone or in Combination, against Biofilms ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
- A comprehensive review of integrative pharmacology-based investigation: A paradigm shift in traditional Chinese medicine.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2021Review
- Potential benefit of combination antifungal therapy inBMJ case reports · 2020Article
- Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although amphotericin B-azole combination therapy has traditionally been questioned due to potential antagonistic interactions, it is often used successfully to treat refractory invasive aspergillosis. So far, pharmacodynamic (PD) interactions have been assessed with conventional in vitro tests, which do not mimic human serum concentrations and animal models using limited doses. We therefore simulated the human serum concentration profiles of amphotericin B and voriconazole in an in vitro dialysis/diffusion closed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model and studied the pharmacodynamic interactions against an azole-resistant and an azole-susceptible Aspergillus fumigatus isolate, using Bliss independence and canonical mixture response surface analyses. Amphotericin B dosing regimens with the drug administered every 24 h (q24h) were combined with voriconazole q12h dosing regimens. In vitro PK-PD combination data were then combined with human PK data by using Monte Carlo analysis. The target attainment rate and the serum concentration/MIC ratio were calculated for isolates with different MICs. Synergy (20 to 31%) was observed at low amphotericin B-high voriconazole exposures, whereas antagonism (-6 to -16%) was found at high amphotericin B-low voriconazole exposures for both isolates. Combination therapy resulted in 17 to 48% higher target attainment rates than those of monotherapy regimens for isolates with voriconazole/amphotericin B MICs of 1 to 4 mg/liter. Optimal activity was found for combination regimens with a 1.1 total minimum concentration of drug in serum (tCmin)/MIC ratio for voriconazole and a 0.5 total maximum concentration of drug in serum (tCmax)/MIC ratio for amphotericin B, whereas the equally effective monotherapy regimens required a voriconazole tCmin/MIC ratio of 1.8 and an amphotericin B tCmax/MIC ratio of 2.8. Amphotericin B-voriconazole combination regimens were more effective than monotherapy regimens. Therapeutic drug monitoring can be employed to optimize antifungal combination therapy with low-dose (≤0.6 mg/kg) amphotericin B-based combination regimens against resistant isolates for minimal toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.