Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25896524›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2015

A biomechanical perspective on stress fiber structure and function.

Elena Kassianidou, Sanjay Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanobiology of the Hippo-YAP Signaling Network.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Marangoni effect and cell spreading.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Actin Stress Fibers Response and Adaptation under Stretch.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena KassianidouDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, United States.
Sanjay KumarDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, United States. Electronic address: skumar@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143836 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LIPHARDT, JAN T. · 2009 to 2014
$15.1M
Molecular analysis of physical microenvironmental control of tumor cell invasionR21CA174573 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KUMAR, SANJAY · 2014 to 2016
$655k
Genetic strategies for the quantitative control of cell-matrix mechanobiologyR21EB016359 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KUMAR, SANJAY · 2013 to 2014
$425k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS R21 CA174573NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143836NCI NIH HHS U54CA143836NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB016359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress fibers are actomyosin-based bundles whose structural and contractile properties underlie numerous cellular processes including adhesion, motility and mechanosensing. Recent advances in high-resolution live-cell imaging and single-cell force measurement have dramatically sharpened our understanding of the assembly, connectivity, and evolution of various specialized stress fiber subpopulations. This in turn has motivated interest in understanding how individual stress fibers generate tension and support cellular structure and force generation. In this review, we discuss approaches for measuring the mechanical properties of single stress fibers. We begin by discussing studies conducted in cell-free settings, including strategies based on isolation of intact stress fibers and reconstitution of stress fiber-like structures from purified components. We then discuss measurements obtained in living cells based both on inference of stress fiber properties from whole-cell mechanical measurements (e.g., atomic force microscopy) and on direct interrogation of single stress fibers (e.g., subcellular laser nanosurgery). We conclude by reviewing various mathematical models of stress fiber function that have been developed based on these experimental measurements. An important future challenge in this area will be the integration of these sophisticated biophysical measurements with the field's increasingly detailed molecular understanding of stress fiber assembly, dynamics, and signal transduction. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Mechanobiology.

Indexed as

Stress FibersAnimalsCell AdhesionCell MovementHumansMechanotransduction, CellularBiomechanical propertyMechanobiologyStress fiberSubcellular laser ablation

Identifiers

PMID25896524
PMCPMC4589434
OpenAlexW2095498429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.