Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25896512›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Improved sensitivity of the urine CAA lateral-flow assay for diagnosing active Schistosoma infections by using larger sample volumes.

Paul L A M Corstjens, Ruth K Nyakundi, Claudia J de Dood, Thomas M Kariuki, Elizabeth A Ochola, Diana M S Karanja, Pauline N M Mwinzi, Govert J van Dam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Refining Diagnosis ofFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Detecting twoFrontiers in parasitology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul L A M CorstjensDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands. p.corstjens@lumc.nl.
Ruth K NyakundiInstitute of Primate Research, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya. nyakundirk@gmail.com.
Claudia J de DoodDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands. C.J.de_Dood@lumc.nl.
Thomas M KariukiInstitute of Primate Research, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya. tkariuki@africaonline.co.ke.
Elizabeth A OcholaCenter for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya. EAkinyi@kemricdc.org.
Diana M S KaranjaCenter for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya. DKaranja@kemricdc.org.
Pauline N M MwinziCenter for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya. PMwinzi@kemricdc.org.
Govert J van DamDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. G.J.van_Dam@lumc.nl.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KELeiden University Medical Center · NLInstitute of Primate Research · KENational Museums of Kenya · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate determination of Schistosoma infection rates in low endemic regions to examine progress towards interruption of transmission and elimination requires highly sensitive diagnostic tools. An existing lateral flow (LF) based test demonstrating ongoing infections through detection of worm circulating anodic antigen (CAA), was improved for sensitivity through implementation of a protocol allowing increased sample input. Urine is the preferred sample as collection is non-invasive and sample volume is generally not a restriction.

methodsCentrifugal filtration devices provided a method to concentrate supernatant of urine samples extracted with trichloroacetic acid (TCA). For field trials a practical sample volume of 2 mL urine allowed detection of CAA down to 0.3 pg/mL. The method was evaluated on a set of urine samples (n = 113) from an S. mansoni endemic region (Kisumu, Kenya) and compared to stool microscopy (Kato Katz, KK). In this analysis true positivity was defined as a sample with either a positive KK or UCAA test.

resultsImplementation of the concentration method increased clinical sensitivity (Sn) from 44 to 98% when moving from the standard 10 μL (UCAA10 assay) to 2000 μL (UCAA2000 assay) urine sample input. Sn for KK varied between 23 and 35% for a duplicate KK (single stool, two slides) to 52% for a six-fold KK (three consecutive day stools, two slides). The UCAA2000 assay indicated 47 positive samples with CAA concentration above 0.3 pg/mL. The six-fold KK detected 25 egg positives; 1 sample with 2 eggs detected in the 6-fold KK was not identified with the UCAA2000 assay.

conclusionsLarger sample input increased Sn of the UCAA assay to a level indicating 'true' infection. Only a single 2 mL urine sample is needed, but analysing larger sample volumes could still increase test accuracy. The UCAA2000 test is an appropriate candidate for accurate identification of all infected individuals in low-endemic regions. Assay materials do not require refrigeration and collected urine samples may be stored and transported to central test laboratories without the need to be frozen.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, HelminthFecesGlycoproteinsHelminth ProteinsHumansParasite Egg CountSchistosoma mansoniSchistosomiasis mansoniSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, Helminthcirculating anodic antigen, Schistosoma mansoniGlycoproteinsHelminth Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25896512
PMCPMC4418045
OpenAlexW2095378642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.