Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25896460›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of ophthalmology2015

Choroidal Thickness Profiles in Myopic Eyes of Young Adults in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial Cohort.

Elise Harb, Leslie Hyman, Jane Gwiazda, Wendy Marsh-Tootle, Qinghua Zhang, Wei Hou, Thomas T Norton, Katherine Weise, Keri Dirkes, Linda M Zangwill and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06527274 (Effect of Defocus in Soft Contact Lenses on Internal Retinal Vascularization), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06527274 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Defocus in Soft Contact Lenses on Internal Retinal Vascularization

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité de MontréalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled25ConditionsNearsightednessArmsExperimental: Myopic defocus soft lens design (MDSL), Active Comparator: Single vision soft lens design (SVSL
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Interaction Between Near Work and Narrowband Light on Choroidal Thickness.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. RLRL Therapeutic Feasibility and Potential Mechanism on Myopia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elise HarbNew England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: harbe@berkeley.edu.
Leslie HymanStony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Jane GwiazdaNew England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts.
Wendy Marsh-TootleUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Optometry, Birmingham, Alabama.
Qinghua ZhangStony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Wei HouStony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Thomas T NortonUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Optometry, Birmingham, Alabama.
Katherine WeiseUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Optometry, Birmingham, Alabama.
Keri DirkesHamilton Glaucoma Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Linda M ZangwillHamilton Glaucoma Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.
COMET Study Group

Funding

Research Programming ModuleP30EY007551 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI LAURA J. FRISHMAN · 1988 to 2026
$16.4M
Vision BiostatisticsP30EY022589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LINDA M ZANGWILL · 2012 to 2026
$10.3M
EVALUATION TRIAL--COORDINATING CENTERU10EY011805 · NEI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI HYMAN, LESLIE G · 1996 to 2013
$9.4M
CORRECTION OF MYOPIA EVALUATION TRIAL--CLINICAL CENTERU10EY011754 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WEISE, KATHERINE K · 1997 to 2013
$2.9M
CORRECTION OF MYOPIA TRIAL--CLINICAL CENTERU10EY011740 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI MANNY, RUTH E · 1997 to 2013
$2.8M
CORRECTION OF MYOPIA EVALUATION TRIAL (COMET)U10EY011755 · NEI · SALUS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEIMAN, MITCHELL M · 1997 to 2013
$2.6M
CORRECTION OF MYOPIA EVALUATION TRIAL--CLINICAL CENTERU10EY011752 · NEI · NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI WEISSBERG, ERIK MATTHEW · 1997 to 2012
$2.3M
CORRECTION OF MYOPIA EVALUATION TRIAL--CHAIR PHASE IIU10EY011756 · NEI · NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI GWIAZDA, JANE E. · 1997 to 2013
$2.1M
Changes in astigmatism and anisometropia with progressing myopia in COMETR21EY023263 · NEI · NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI GWIAZDA, JANE E. · 2013 to 2013
$202k
NEI NIH HHS EY023263NEI NIH HHS EY11740NEI NIH HHS EY11752NEI NIH HHS EY11754NEI NIH HHS EY11755NEI NIH HHS EY11756NEI NIH HHS EY11805NEI NIH HHS P30 EY007551NEI NIH HHS P30 EY022589NEI NIH HHS P30EY022589NEI NIH HHS U10 EY011740NEI NIH HHS U10 EY011752NEI NIH HHS U10 EY011754NEI NIH HHS U10 EY011755NEI NIH HHS U10 EY011756NEI NIH HHS U10 EY011805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the relationship of choroidal thickness with axial length (AL) and myopia in young adult eyes in the ethnically diverse Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET) cohort.

designCross-sectional, multicenter study.

methodsIn addition to measures of myopia by cycloplegic autorefraction and AL by A-scan ultrasonography, participants underwent optical coherence tomography imaging of the choroid in both eyes at their last visit (14 years after baseline). Using digital calipers, 2 independent readers measured choroidal thickness in the right eye (left eye if poor quality; n = 37) at 7 locations: fovea and 750, 1500, and 2250 μm nasal (N) and temporal (T) to the fovea.

resultsChoroidal thickness measurements were available from 294 of 346 (85%) imaged participants (mean age: 24.3 ± 1.4 years; 44.9% male) with mean myopia of -5.3 ± 2.0 diopters and mean AL of 25.5 ± 1.0 mm. Overall, choroidal thickness varied by location (P < .0001) and was thickest at the fovea (273.8 ± 70.9 μm) and thinnest nasally (N2250, 191.5 ± 69.3 μm). Multivariable analyses showed significantly thinner choroids in eyes with more myopia and longer AL at all locations except T2250 (P ≤ .001) and presence of peripapillary crescent at all locations except T1500 and T2250 (P ≤ .0001). Choroidal thickness varied by ethnicity at N2250 (P < .0001), with Asians having the thinnest and African Americans the thickest choroids.

conclusionChoroids are thinner in longer, more myopic young adult eyes. The thinning was most prominent nasally and in eyes with a crescent. In the furthest nasal location, ethnicity was associated with choroidal thickness. The findings suggest that choroidal thickness should be evaluated, especially in the nasal regions where myopic degenerations are most commonly seen clinically.

Indexed as

EyeglassesAdultAxial Length, EyeChoroidCross-Sectional StudiesDouble-Blind MethodEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMyopiaOrgan SizeRefraction, OcularTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25896460
PMCPMC4465039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.