Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25896279›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of developmental biology2014

Optogenetics in Developmental Biology: using light to control ion flux-dependent signals in Xenopus embryos.

Dany Spencer Adams, Joan M Lemire, Richard H Kramer, Michael Levin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing circuit function in the developingFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dany Spencer AdamsDept of Biology and Center for Regenerative and Developmental Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Joan M Lemire
Richard H Kramer
Michael Levin

Funding

Light-activated ion chanenls for remote control of neuronal activityR01EY018957 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KRAMER, RICHARD H · 2008 to 2011
$1.6M
A universal photoswitch system for optical control of neuronal receptorsR01MH088484 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KRAMER, RICHARD H · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
Biophysical controls of vertebrate organ regenerationR01GM078484 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI LEVIN, MICHAEL · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
Ductin's Role in Craniofacial Patterning and DevelopmentK22DE016633 · NIDCR · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI ADAMS, DANY SPENCER · 2005 to 2009
$585k
NEI NIH HHS EY018957NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018957NIDCR NIH HHS K22 DE016633NIGMS NIH HHS GM078484NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078484NIMH NIH HHS MH088484NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH088484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental bioelectricity, electrical signaling among non-excitable cells, is now known to regulate proliferation, apoptosis, gene expression, and patterning during development. The extraordinary temporal and spatial resolution offered by optogenetics could revolutionize the study of bioelectricity the same way it has revolutionized neuroscience. There is, however, no guide to adapting optogenetics to patterning systems. To fill this gap, we used optogenetic reagents, both proteins and photochemical switches, to vary steady-state bioelectrical properties of non-spiking embryonic cells in Xenopus laevis. We injected mRNA for various proteins, including Channelrhodopsins and Archaerhodopsin, into 1-8 cell embryos, or soaked embryos in media containing photochemical switches, then examined the effect of light and dark on membrane voltage (Vmem) using both electrodes and fluorescent membrane voltage reporters. We also scored tadpoles for known effects of varying Vmem, including left-right asymmetry disruption, hyperpigmentation, and craniofacial phenotypes. The majority of reagents we tested caused a significant increase in the percentage of light-exposed tadpoles showing relevant phenotypes; however, the majority of reagents also induced phenotypes in controls kept in the dark. Experiments on this "dark phenotype" yielded evidence that the direction of ion flux via common optogenetic reagents may be reversed, or unpredictable in non-neural cells. When used in combination with rigorous controls, optogenetics can be a powerful tool for investigating ion-flux based signaling in non-excitable systems. Nonetheless, it is crucial that new reagents be designed with these non-neural cell types in mind.

Indexed as

LightAnimalsArchaeal ProteinsBody PatterningCell ProliferationElectricityEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryo, NonmammalianGene Expression RegulationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalIon TransportLarvaMembrane PotentialsOptogeneticsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhotochemical ProcessesArchaeal Proteinsarchaerhodopsin protein, ArchaeaProton PumpsRhodopsinRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25896279
PMCPMC10468825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.