Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25896199›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2015

Environmental monitoring of bacterial contamination and antibiotic resistance patterns of the fecal coliforms isolated from Cauvery River, a major drinking water source in Karnataka, India.

Sinosh Skariyachan, Arpitha Badarinath Mahajanakatti, Nisha Jayaprakash Grandhi, Akshatha Prasanna, Ballari Sen, Narasimha Sharma, Kiran S Vasist, Rajeswari Narayanappa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A One Health Review of Community-Acquired Antimicrobial-ResistantInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Monitoring of Water Quality, Antibiotic Residues, and Antibiotic-ResistantInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Antimicrobial resistance: Call for rational antibiotics practice in India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Review
  12. Distribution of Antibiotic-ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Antimicrobial resistance in the environment: The Indian scenario.The Indian journal of medical research · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Antibiotic Resistance Characterization of EnvironmentalInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sinosh SkariyachanDepartment of Biotechnology Engineering, Dayananda Sagar Institutions, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 078, India, sinoshskariya@gmail.com.
Arpitha Badarinath Mahajanakatti
Nisha Jayaprakash Grandhi
Akshatha Prasanna
Ballari Sen
Narasimha Sharma
Kiran S Vasist
Rajeswari Narayanappa
Visvesvaraya Technological University · INDr. Hari Singh Gour University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study focuses prudent elucidation of microbial pollution and antibiotic sensitivity profiling of the fecal coliforms isolated from River Cauvery, a major drinking water source in Karnataka, India. Water samples were collected from ten hotspots during the year 2011-2012. The physiochemical characteristics and microbial count of water samples collected from most of the hotspots exhibited greater biological oxygen demand and bacterial count especially coliforms in comparison with control samples (p ≤ 0.01). The antibiotic sensitivity testing was performed using 48 antibiotics against the bacterial isolates by disk-diffusion assay. The current study showed that out of 848 bacterial isolates, 93.51% (n = 793) of the isolates were found to be multidrug-resistant to most of the current generation antibiotics. Among the major isolates, 96.46% (n = 273) of the isolates were found to be multidrug-resistant to 30 antibiotics and they were identified to be Escherichia coli by 16S rDNA gene sequencing. Similarly, 93.85% (n = 107), 94.49% (n = 103), and 90.22% (n = 157) of the isolates exhibited multiple drug resistance to 32, 40, and 37 antibiotics, and they were identified to be Enterobacter cloacae, Pseudomonas trivialis, and Shigella sonnei, respectively. The molecular studies suggested the prevalence of bla TEM genes in all the four isolates and dhfr gene in Escherichia coli and Sh. sonnei. Analogously, most of the other Gram-negative bacteria were found to be multidrug-resistant and the Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus spp. isolated from the water samples were found to be methicillin and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. This is probably the first study elucidating the bacterial pollution and antibiotic sensitivity profiling of fecal coliforms isolated from River Cauvery, Karnataka, India.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringWater MicrobiologyDrinking WaterDrug Resistance, MicrobialIndiaMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusRiversDrinking Water

Identifiers

PMID25896199
OpenAlexW2144783353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.