ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2015
Rifamycin Derivatives Are Effective Against Staphylococcal Biofilms In Vitro and Elutable From PMMA.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial-loaded cements and beads in orthopedic trauma and arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Review
- Human gelatin thrombin matrix with rifampin for the treatment of prosthetic vascular graft infections.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2024Article
- Phytochemical Analysis and Anti-Biofilm Potential That Cause Dental Caries from Black Cumin Seeds (Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- Comparing the Synergistic and Antagonistic Interactions of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin Combined with Rifampin against Drug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Stability of Non-Ionic Surfactant Vesicles Loaded with Rifamycin S.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Can intracellular Staphylococcus aureus in osteomyelitis be treated using current antibiotics? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Bone research · 2022Review
- A Case Series of Rifabutin Use in Staphylococcal Prosthetic Infections.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- The tale of microencapsulated rifampicin: is it useful for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection?International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Rifaximine spacer application is not superior to local teicoplanin treatment in a rat model of osteomyelitis.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2022Article
- In vitro antibiotic activity against intraosteoblastic Staphylococcus aureus: a narrative review of the literature.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2021Review
- Rifamycin antibiotics and the mechanisms of their failure.The Journal of antibiotics · 2021Review
- Rifampin, Rifapentine, and Rifabutin Are Active against Intracellular Periprosthetic Joint Infection-Associated Staphylococcus epidermidis.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
- Macrocycle-Antibiotic Hybrids: A Path to Clinical Candidates.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Review
- Effects of powdered rifampin and vancomycin solutions on biofilm production ofJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Radical scavenging of poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement by rifampin and clinically relevant properties of the rifampin-loaded cement.Bone & joint research · 2019Article
- Role of Rifampin against Staphylococcal Biofilm InfectionsAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019Review
- Rifampin and tobramycin combination with PMMA antibiotic cement.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2019Article
- Antibiotic-Loaded Polymethylmethacrylate Beads and Spacers in Treatment of Orthopedic Infections and the Role of Biofilm Formation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocal antimicrobial delivery through polymethylmethacrylate beads (PMMA), commonly vancomycin, is used for the treatment of contaminated open fractures but has limited activity against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms, which occur commonly in such fractures. Rifamycins have activity against biofilms and are an effective treatment for osteoarticular infections involving staphylococcal biofilms, but there are limited studies evaluating the activity of rifamycin derivatives, other than rifampin, against biofilms of S. aureus and evaluating incorporation of these drugs into PMMA for treatment of contaminated open fractures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are rifamycin derivatives effective against established biofilms of clinical isolates of S. aureus? (2) Can PMMA be used as a carrier for rifamycin derivatives?
methodsBiofilms were developed and evaluated for susceptibility to a panel of antimicrobials in vitro using the minimum biofilm eradication concentration high-throughput model. Susceptibility was assessed by measuring bacterial recovery at 6 and 24 hours after antimicrobial treatment. Activity of rifamycin derivatives against intracellular bacteria was also evaluated using a gentamicin protection assay. Evaluation of PMMA as a carrier for rifampin and rifamycin derivatives was determined by assessing the curing time subsequent to loading of rifamycins and characterizing the release kinetics of rifamycins at daily intervals for 14 days from PMMA by performing bioassays.
resultsRifamycin derivatives between 1 and 8 µg/mL reduced bacteria within biofilms 5- to 9-logs and prevented bacterial recovery up to 24 hours post-treatment, indicating near to complete eradication of biofilms. Rifamycin derivatives at 32 µg/mL had activity against intracellular staphylococci, significantly reducing the number of internalized bacteria with limited effects on osteoblast viability. Rifampin was the only rifamycin observed to have a suitable release profile from PMMA, releasing 49% of the total antibiotic and maintaining a sustained released profile up to 14 days at a mean 28 ± 6 μg/mL.
conclusionsRifampin can be incorporated into PMMA and eluted at concentrations effective against biofilms and intracellular staphylococci. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our in vitro findings suggest that local delivery of rifampin may be an effective strategy for the prevention and/or treatment of open fractures where S. aureus biofilms might develop. Clinical studies are needed to characterize what role this approach might have in the prevention and treatment of infections involving biofilms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.