Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25896128›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2016

Neointimal coverage and late apposition of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implanted in the acute phase of myocardial infarction: OCT data from the PRAGUE-19 study.

Petr Toušek, Viktor Kočka, Martin Malý, Libor Lisa, Tomáš Buděšínský, Petr Widimský

Abstract readClinical Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Petr ToušekThird Faculty of Medicine, Cardiocenter, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Ruska 87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Viktor KočkaThird Faculty of Medicine, Cardiocenter, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Ruska 87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic. viktor.kocka@fnkv.cz.
Martin MalýFirst Faculty of Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Charles University in Prague, Central Military Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Libor LisaThird Faculty of Medicine, Cardiocenter, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Ruska 87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomáš BuděšínskýThird Faculty of Medicine, Cardiocenter, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Ruska 87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr WidimskýThird Faculty of Medicine, Cardiocenter, Charles University in Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Ruska 87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZMilitary University Hospital Prague · CZUniversity Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incomplete stent apposition and uncovered struts are associated with a higher risk of stent thrombosis. No data exist on the process of neointimal coverage and late apposition status of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) when implanted in the highly thrombogenic setting of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to assess the serial changes in strut apposition and early neointimal coverage of the BVS using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in selected patients enrolled in the PRAGUE-19 study. Intracoronary OCT was performed in 50 patients at the end of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute STEMI. Repeated OCT of the implanted BVS was performed in 10 patients. Scaffold area, scaffold mean diameter and incomplete strut apposition (ISA) were compared between baseline and control OCT. Furthermore, strut neointimal coverage was assessed during the control OCT. Mean scaffold area and diameter did not change between the baseline and control OCT (8.59 vs. 9.06 mm(2); p = 0.129 and 3.31 vs. 3.37 mm; p = 0.202, respectively). Differences were observed in ISA between the baseline and control OCT (0.63 vs. 1.47 %; p < 0.05). We observed 83.1 % covered struts in eight patients in whom the control OCT was performed 4-6 weeks after BVS implantation, and 100 % covered struts in two patients 6 months after BVS implantation. Persistent strut apposition and early neointimal coverage were observed after biodegradable vascular scaffold implantation in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleNeointimaAgedCardiovascular AgentsCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsCzech RepublicEverolimusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignCardiovascular AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleEverolimusAcute myocardial infarctionBiodegradable vascular scaffoldLate appositionNeointimal coverage

Identifiers

PMID25896128
OpenAlexW2062199548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.