Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25895975›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Explanatory factors for first and second-generation non-western women's inadequate prenatal care utilisation: a prospective cohort study.

Agatha W Boerleider, Judith Manniën, Cherelle M V van Stenus, Therese A Wiegers, Esther I Feijen-de Jong, Evelien R Spelten, Walter L J M Devillé

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Maternal Health Beliefs, Perceptions, and Experiences in a U.S. Marshallese Community.Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Inadequate prenatal care use among Canadian mothers: findings from the Maternity Experiences Survey.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Agatha W BoerleiderNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands. agathawb75@yahoo.com.
Judith ManniënDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. judithmannien@gmail.com.
Cherelle M V van StenusAthena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. c.m.v.vanstenus@utwente.nl.
Therese A WiegersNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands. t.wiegers@nivel.nl.
Esther I Feijen-de JongDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Esther.Feijen@inholland.nl.
Evelien R SpeltenDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. evelienspelten@yahoo.com.
Walter L J M DevilléNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands. w.l.j.m.deville@uva.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle research into non-western women's prenatal care utilisation in industrialised western countries has taken generational differences into account. In this study we examined non-western women's prenatal care utilisation and its explanatory factors according to generational status.

methodsData from 3300 women participating in a prospective cohort of primary midwifery care clients (i.e. women with no complications or no increased risk for complications during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium who receive maternity care by autonomous midwives) in the Netherlands (the DELIVER study) was used. Gestational age at entry and the total number of prenatal visits were aggregated into an index. The extent to which potential factors explained non-western women's prenatal care utilisation was assessed by means of blockwise logistic regression analyses and percentage changes in odds ratios.

resultsThe unadjusted odds of first and second-generation non-western women making inadequate use of prenatal care were 3.26 and 1.96 times greater than for native Dutch women. For the first generation, sociocultural factors explained 43% of inadequate prenatal care utilisation, socioeconomic factors explained 33% and demographic and pregnancy factors explained 29%. For the second generation, sociocultural factors explained 66% of inadequate prenatal care utilisation.

conclusionIrrespective of generation, strategies to improve utilisation should focus on those with the following sociocultural characteristics (not speaking Dutch at home, no partner or a first-generation non-Dutch partner). For the first generation, strategies should also focus on those with the following demographic, pregnancy and socioeconomic characteristics (aged ≤ 19 or ≥ 36, unplanned pregnancies, poor obstetric histories (extra-uterine pregnancy, molar pregnancy or abortion), a low educational level, below average net household income and no supplementary insurance.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersCultureEmigrants and ImmigrantsLanguageMidwiferyAdolescentAdultAge FactorsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncomeInsurance, HealthLogistic ModelsMoroccoNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID25895975
PMCPMC4409999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.