Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25895611›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2015

Clinical management of breast cancer heterogeneity.

Dimitrios Zardavas, Alexandre Irrthum, Charles Swanton, Martine Piccart

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04920708 (Randomised Open-label Phase II Study of Induction Standard of Care Fulvestrant and CDK4/6 Inhibition With the Addition of Ipatasertib in Metastatic ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer Patients Without ctDNA Suppression), which is not on this map. Cited by 331 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
331citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04920708 phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomised Open-label Phase II Study of Induction Standard of Care Fulvestrant and CDK4/6 Inhibition With the Addition of Ipatasertib in Metastatic ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer Patients Without ctDNA Suppression

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustRan2022 to 2027Enrolled57ConditionsMetastatic Breast Cancer, ER+ Breast Cancer, Advanced Breast CancerArmsIpatasertib 300mg, Fulvestrant 500g, Palbociclib 75mg-125mg, CDK4/6 Inhibitor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

331 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 562 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association Between theFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

271 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dimitrios ZardavasBreast International Group (BIG)-aisbl c/o Jules Bordet Institute, Boulevard de Waterloo 121, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Alexandre IrrthumBreast International Group (BIG)-aisbl c/o Jules Bordet Institute, Boulevard de Waterloo 121, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Charles SwantonUniversity College London Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, Paul O'Gorman Building, Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK.
Martine PiccartJules Bordet Institute, Boulevard de Waterloo 121, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Breast International Group · BECRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence · GBInstitut Jules Bordet · BE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, intertumour heterogeneity in breast cancer has been documented in terms of different histological subtypes, treatment sensitivity profiles, and clinical outcomes among different patients. Results of high-throughput molecular profiling studies have subsequently revealed the true extent of this heterogeneity. Further complicating this scenario, the heterogeneous expression of the oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 has been reported in different areas of the same tumour. Furthermore, discordance, in terms of ER, PR and HER2 expression, has also been reported between primary tumours and their matched metastatic lesions. High-throughput molecular profiling studies have confirmed that spatial and temporal intratumour heterogeneity of breast cancers exist at a level beyond common expectations. We describe the different levels of tumour heterogeneity, and discuss the strategies that can be adopted by clinicians to tackle treatment response and resistance issues associated with such heterogeneity, including a rationally selected combination of agents that target driver mutations, the targeting of deleterious passenger mutations, identifying and eradicating the 'lethal' clone, targeting the tumour microenvironment, or using adaptive treatments and immunotherapy. The identification of the most-appropriate strategies and their implementation in the clinic will prove highly challenging and necessitate the adoption of radically new practices for the optimal clinical management of breast malignancies.

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityBreast NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplastic Stem CellsTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID25895611
OpenAlexW2067287567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.