Trial reportDer Urologe. Ausg. A2015
[Complications after ileal conduit: Urinary diversion-associated complications after radical cystectomy].
Trial report in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Elderly Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy With Ureterocutaneostomy or Ileal Conduit With a Special Focus on Bowl Complications Requiring Surgical Revision.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- [Bilateral hydronephrosis as a result of opioid-induced bowel spasm in a patient with an ileal conduit].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe analyzed complications associated with urinary diversion after radical cystectomy (RC) and ileal conduit (IC) for bladder cancer (BCa). PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 305 BCa patients after RC with IC were included in the study (June 2003-December 2010). IC complications (peristomal hernia, IC stenosis, stenosis of the ureteral anastomosis, IC bleeding, urolithiasis, urinary infections, and renal insufficiency) were identified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Kaplan-Meier plots were generated. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression analyses with backward selection for prediction of high-grade complications (CDC ≥ III) and IC revision surgery were conducted; covariates included age, previous abdominal/pelvic radiation, body mass index (BMI), previous abdominal/pelvic surgery, comorbidities, and advanced tumor stage.
resultsAn IC complication (CDC ≥ I) or a high-grade IC complication (CDC ≥ III) was experienced by 32.7 and 13.4 % of our cohort: 14.8 %, 4.3 %, 4.6 % developed a peristomal hernia, IC stenosis, stenosis of the ureteral anastomosis, respectively. IC revision was required by 10.5 % of patients (median follow-up 19.5 months, IQR 7-47 months). The estimated rate of IC complications at 5 years was 52 % (CDC ≥ I) and 22 % (CDC ≥ III). The final model of the multivariable analysis showed that patients with a history of previous radiation (HR 4.33), a BMI ≥ 30 (HR 2.24), or longer duration of surgery (HR 1.01; all p < 0.05) were at higher risk for IC revision surgery. A BMI ≥ 30 (HR 2.49, p = 0.011) was a risk factor for high-grade complications.
conclusionThe risk of experiencing a high-grade IC complication is moderate. Previous radiation, obesity, and comorbidities represent risk factors for IC revision surgery. Moreover, obesity is a risk factor for high-grade complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25895565What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.