Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25895518›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2015

Peptic Ulcer Bleeding Risk. The Role of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in NSAID/Low-Dose Aspirin Users.

C Sostres, P Carrera-Lasfuentes, R Benito, P Roncales, M Arruebo, M T Arroyo, L Bujanda, L A García-Rodríguez, A Lanas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. First regional consensus on the management ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Helicobacter pylori infection.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. AdhesiveFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Helicobacter pylori Infection: New Facts in Clinical Management.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
  11. Hellenic consensus onAnnals of gastroenterology
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

C SostresUniversitary Hospital Lozano Blesa, Gastroenterology Unit, Zaragoza, Spain.
P Carrera-LasfuentesCIBERehd, Madrid, Spain.
R BenitoUniversitary Hospital Lozano Blesa, Microbiology Unit, Zaragoza, Spain.
P RoncalesHealth Science Institute of Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain.
M ArrueboHealth Science Institute of Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain.
M T ArroyoUniversitary Hospital Lozano Blesa, Gastroenterology Unit, Zaragoza, Spain.
L BujandaUniversitary Hospital of Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain.
L A García-RodríguezCEIFE, Madrid, Spain.
A Lanas1] Universitary Hospital Lozano Blesa, Gastroenterology Unit, Zaragoza, Spain [2] CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain [3] Health Science Institute of Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHelicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and NSAID/low-dose aspirin (ASA) use are associated with peptic ulcer disease. The risk of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) associated with the interaction of these factors remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the risk of PUB associated with the interaction between H. pylori infection and current nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or low-dose ASA use.

methodsThis was a case-control study of consecutive patients hospitalized because of PUB. Controls were matched by age, sex, and month of admission. H. pylori infection status was determined in all cases and controls by serology. Drug use was determined by structured questionnaire. Adjusted relative risk (RR) associated with different factors, and the interaction between NSAID/ASA and H. pylori infection was estimated by logistic regression analysis.

resultsThe study included 666 cases of PUB and 666 controls; 74.3% cases and 54.8% controls (RR: 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-3.3) tested positive for H. pylori infection; 34.5% of cases had current NSAID use compared with 13.4% of controls (RR: 4.0; 95% CI: 3.0-5.4). Respective proportions for low-dose ASA use were 15.8 and 12%, respectively (RR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3-2.7). The RR of PUB for concomitant NSAID use and H. pylori infection suggested an additive effect (RR: 8.0; 95% CI: 5.0-12.8), whereas no interaction was observed with ASA use (RR: 3.5; 95% CI: 2.0-6.1).

conclusionsNSAID, low-dose ASA use, and H. pylori infection are three independent risk factors for the development of PUB, but there were differences in the interaction effect between low-dose ASA (no interaction) or NSAID (addition) use and H. pylori infection, which may have implications for clinical practice in prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Helicobacter pyloriAdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinCase-Control StudiesFemaleHelicobacter InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptic Ulcer HemorrhageProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirin

Identifiers

PMID25895518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.