Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25895465›Full record

ReviewDrugs2015

Targeting high-density lipoproteins: increasing de novo production versus decreasing clearance.

Arshag D Mooradian, Michael J Haas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arshag D MooradianDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 655 West 11th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA, Arshag.mooradian@jax.ufl.edu.
Michael J Haas
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although cardiovascular mortality has been decreasing in industrialized countries, there continues to be a substantial residual risk; thus, novel therapeutic agents and new targets of therapy have been sought. One highly plausible therapeutic target is high-density lipoprotein (HDL). HDL is a key player in reverse cholesterol transport and possesses a slew of other cardioprotective properties; however, recent trials with agents known to increase HDL levels have generally not shown any reduction in cardiovascular events. Further analysis of these trials suggest that fibrates have consistently reduced some cardiovascular outcomes, at least in the subgroup of patients with high serum triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol (HDLc) levels. Since fibrates, unlike niacin or cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors, increase HDLc level mostly through the stimulation of apolipoprotein A-I production, it is suggested that the quality and functionality of HDL are enhanced when de novo synthesis rather than inhibition of turnover is the mechanism of increasing HDL level. In this communication, the evidence for and against the cardioprotective properties of HDL is reviewed and the contemporary clinical trials are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiovascular AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, HDLClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansLipoproteins, HDLNiacinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTriglyceridesCardiovascular AgentsCholesterol, HDLLipoproteins, HDLNiacinTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID25895465
OpenAlexW2053786218

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.