Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25895099›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2015

A phase 1 study of ABT-806 in subjects with advanced solid tumors.

James M Cleary, David A Reardon, Nilofer Azad, Leena Gandhi, Geoffrey I Shapiro, Jorge Chaves, Michelle Pedersen, Peter Ansell, William Ames, Hao Xiong and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

James M ClearyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA, jcleary@partners.org.
David A Reardon
Nilofer Azad
Leena Gandhi
Geoffrey I Shapiro
Jorge Chaves
Michelle Pedersen
Peter Ansell
William Ames
Hao Xiong
Wijith Munasinghe
Matt Dudley
Edward B Reilly
Kyle Holen
Rod Humerickhouse
AbbVie (United States) · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USJohns Hopkins University · USNorthwest Medical Specialties · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeABT-806, a humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody, binds a unique epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) epitope exposed in the EGFRde2-7 (EGFRvIII) deletion mutant and other EGFR proteins in the activated state. This phase I study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ABT-806 in patients with solid tumors that commonly overexpress activated EGFR or EGFRvlll.

methodsPatients with advanced solid tumors, including glioblastoma, were eligible. Following a dose escalation phase, expanded safety cohorts of patients with solid tumors or EGFR-amplified glioblastoma were enrolled. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0; tumor response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. EGFR protein expression was quantified by immunohistochemistry.

results49 patients were treated. Frequent AEs (≥10 %) possibly/probably related to ABT-806 were fatigue (18 %), nausea (16 %), dermatitis acneiform (12 %), and vomiting (10 %). Only one dose-limiting toxicity (grade three morbilliform rash) occurred. The RP2D was the pre-specified highest dose (24 mg/kg). Systemic exposures were dose proportional between 2 and 24 mg/kg. Median time to progression was 55 days (95 % confidence interval, 53-57) in all patients and 43 days (22-57) for glioblastoma patients. No objective responses occurred; however, two patients had prolonged stable disease. An EGFR-amplified penile cancer patient has stable disease lasting over 2.5 years.

conclusionsABT-806 has unique pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. Toxicities were infrequent and typically low grade at the RP2D. Linear ABT-806 pharmacokinetics suggest lack of significant binding to wild-type EGFR in normal tissues.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorErbB Receptorsmonoclonal antibody 806

Identifiers

PMID25895099
OpenAlexW1982244230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.