ReviewNeuropsychology review2015
Decision Making Under Objective Risk Conditions-a Review of Cognitive and Emotional Correlates, Strategies, Feedback Processing, and External Influences.
Review in Neuropsychology review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neuropsychological Interventions for Decision-Making in Addiction: a Systematic Review.Neuropsychology review · 2019Pooled it
- Interactions of impulsivity, general executive functions, and specific inhibitory control explain symptoms of social-networks-use disorder: An experimental study.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- How Time Pressure Amplifies Framing Effects in Risky Decision-Making: The Role of Attentional Allocation and Information Presentation.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Everyday decision-making in later life: the role of cognitive reserve and cognitive functions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Autistic Adults Avoid Unpredictability in Decision-Making.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Article
- Informed consent competency assessment for brain-computer interface clinical research and application in psychiatric disorders: A systematic review.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Differential pathways from personality to risk-taking: how extraversion and negative emotionality shape decision-making through overconfidence.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Deepening the decisional processes under value-based conditions in patients affected by Parkinson's disease: A comparative study.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- The Impact of Episodic Memory on Decision-Making in Aging: Scenarios from Everyday Life Situations.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Emotional and Cognitive "Route" in Decision-Making Process: The Relationship between Executive Functions, Psychophysiological Correlates, Decisional Styles, and Personality.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Decision-making under conditions of explicit risk and uncertainty in autistic and typically developing adolescents and young adults.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Influence of rhythmic-movement activity intervention on hot executive function of 5- to 6-year-old children.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- High-dimensional Metaverse Platforms and the Virtually Extended Self.Journal of cognition · 2024Article
- Cognitive Functions in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome with Emphasis on Executive Functions and Decision-Making.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Metacognitive Strategy Training Improves Decision-Making Abilities in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Article
- The connectome-based prediction of trust propensity in older adults: A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- The Contribution of Cognitive Factors to Compulsive Buying Behaviour: Insights from Shopping Habit Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Decision Making and Risk Propensity in Individuals with Tendencies towards Specific Internet-Use Disorders.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Phases in the decision to request euthanasia and brain structures involved.Revista de neurologia · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While making decisions under objective risk conditions, the probabilities of the consequences of the available options are either provided or calculable. Brand et al. (Neural Networks 19:1266-1276, 2006) introduced a model describing the neuro-cognitive processes involved in such decisions. In this model, executive functions associated with activity in the fronto-striatal loop are important for developing and applying decision-making strategies, and for verifying, adapting, or revising strategies according to feedback. Emotional rewards and punishments learned from such feedback accompany these processes. In this literature review, we found support for the role of executive functions, but also found evidence for the importance of further cognitive abilities in decision making. Moreover, in addition to reflective processing (driven by cognition), decisions can be guided by impulsive processing (driven by anticipation of emotional reward and punishment). Reflective and impulsive processing may interact during decision making, affecting the evaluation of available options, as both processes are affected by feedback. Decision-making processes are furthermore modulated by individual attributes (e.g., age), and external influences (e.g., stressors). Accordingly, we suggest a revised model of decision making under objective risk conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25894847What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.