Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25894812›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2015

Physiological noise in human cerebellar fMRI.

Wietske van der Zwaag, João Jorge, Denis Butticaz, Rolf Gruetter

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparing end-tidal CONeuroImage · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wietske van der ZwaagCentre d'Imagerie Biomédicale (CIBM), Station 6, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. Wietske.vanderzwaag@epfl.ch.
João JorgeCentre d'Imagerie Biomédicale (CIBM), Station 6, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Denis ButticazCentre d'Imagerie Biomédicale (CIBM), Station 6, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rolf GruetterCentre d'Imagerie Biomédicale (CIBM), Station 6, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare physiological noise contributions in cerebellar and cerebral regions of interest in high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data acquired at 7T, to estimate the need for physiological noise removal in cerebellar fMRI. MATERIALS AND

methodsSignal fluctuations in high resolution (1 mm isotropic) 7T fMRI data were attributed to one of the following categories: task-induced BOLD changes, slow drift, signal changes correlated with the cardiac and respiratory cycles, signal changes related to the cardiac rate and respiratory volume per unit of time or other. [Formula: see text] values for all categories were compared across regions of interest.

resultsIn this high-resolution data, signal fluctuations related to the phase of the cardiac cycle and cardiac rate were shown to be significant, but comparable between cerebellar and cerebral regions of interest. However, respiratory related signal fluctuations were increased in the cerebellar regions, with explained variances that were up to 80 % higher than for the primary motor cortex region.

conclusionEven at a millimetre spatial resolution, significant correlations with both cardiac and respiratory RETROICOR components were found in all healthy volunteer data. Therefore, physiological noise correction is highly likely to improve the temporal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for cerebellar fMRI at 7T, even at high spatial resolution.

Indexed as

ArtifactsModels, NeurologicalModels, StatisticalBrain MappingComputer SimulationHeart RateHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsRespiratory MechanicsSensitivity and SpecificitySignal-To-Noise Ratio3D-EPICerebellumMagnetic resonance imagingNoiseResolution

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.