Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25894811›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2015

Porphyrin-adsorbed Allograft Bone: A Photoactive, Antibiofilm Surface.

Sana S Dastgheyb, Cyrus B Toorkey, Irving M Shapiro, Noreen J Hickok

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sana S DastgheybDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut Street, Suite 501, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Cyrus B Toorkey
Irving M Shapiro
Noreen J Hickok
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Training in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineT32AR052273 · NIAMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI SHAPIRO, IRVING M · 2006 to 2020
$3.3M
Creating an Infection-Free Intraosseus Transcutaneous Amputation ProsthesisR01HD061053 · NICHD · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI ADAMS, CHRISTOPHER S, HICKOK, NOREEN J · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
A new allograft that promotes long-term, infection-free skeletal repairR01DE019901 · NIDCR · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI ADAMS, CHRISTOPHER S, HICKOK, NOREEN J · 2009 to 2010
$875k
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR052273NIAMS NIH HHS T32-AR-052273NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061053NIDCR NIH HHS DE019901NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllograft bone is commonly used to augment bone stock. Unfortunately, allograft is prone to bacterial contamination and current antimicrobial therapies are inadequate. Photoactivated porphyrins combat bacterial growth by production of reactive oxygen species (ROS); however, to our knowledge, they have not been tested in the setting of allograft bone. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Does 5,10,15,20-tetrakis-(4-aminophenyl)-porphyrin (TAPP) stably adsorb to morselized, mineralized allograft? (2) Does Staphylococcus aureus acquire TAPP from TAPP-allograft? (3) Is TAPP-allograft antibacterial to S. aureus? (4) Is ROS production critical for antimicrobial activity? (5) Does illuminated TAPP-allograft dislodge biofilm? (6) Could other photoactive dyes (TAPP, TMPyP, TSP, THP, and methylene blue) confer antimicrobial properties to allograft?

methodsTAPP adsorption to allograft (TAPP-allograft), its localization in S. aureus, and TAPP-allograft long-term stability were determined spectrophotometrically. Antimicrobial activity was measured while activated with light or in the dark during incubation with S. aureus or after allograft biofilm formation. Glutathione was added to illuminated TAPP-allograft to quench ROS and antimicrobial activity was determined. Light-dependent antimicrobial activity of other photoactive dyes (TMPyP, TSP, THP, and methylene blue) adsorbed to allograft was also tested.

resultsWe found (1) porphyrins strongly adhere to bone allograft; and (2) the bacteria are not able to sequester TAPP from the TAPP-allograft; (3) when illuminated, TAPP-allograft is resistant to bacterial adherence; (4) the effects of TAPP are inhibited by the radical scavenger glutathione, indicating ROS-dependent antimicrobial activity; (5) illumination of TAPP-allograft disrupts biofilms; and, (6) other photoactive dyes impede biofilm formation on allograft bone in the presence of light.

conclusionsPorphyrins stably associate with allograft and are inactive until illuminated. Illuminated TAPP-allograft markedly reduces bacterial colonization, which is restored in the presence of radical scavengers. Finally, illuminated TAPP-allograft disrupts biofilms. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this in vitro study suggest that loading bone allograft with biocompatible porphyrins before surgery might allow increased sterility of the allograft during implantation. Future testing in an animal model will determine if these in vitro activities can be used to prevent allograft-based infection in an establishing osteomyelitis.

Indexed as

Coated Materials, BiocompatibleAdsorptionAllograftsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsBone TransplantationDrug StabilityEquipment DesignHumansPhotochemical ProcessesPorphyrinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePorphyrinsReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID25894811
PMCPMC4523521
OpenAlexW2061804425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.