SynthesisUrolithiasis2015
Diabetes mellitus and the risk of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
Synthesis in Urolithiasis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does chronic hyperglycaemia increase the risk of kidney stone disease? results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- Effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors on the risk of nephrolithiasis and urinary tract infections in Thai patients with type 2 diabetes: a hospital-based cohort study.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Urolithiasis Burden in Somalia: Associated Factors and Regional Distribution Among Patients Undergoing CT Scan in Selected Centers in Mogadishu.Research and reports in urology · 2025Article
- The Multidisciplinary Approach in the Management of Patients with Kidney Stone Disease-A State-of-the-Art Review.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Article
- The association of nephrolithiasis with metabolic syndrome and its components: a cross-sectional analysis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) might increase the risk of urolithiasis, but the results were inconsistent. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association between DM and the risk of urolithiasis. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify the relevant observational studies up to November 2014. Reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed. Summary relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate the association between DM and the risk of urolithiasis. We identified 3 case-control studies and 4 cohort studies regarding DM and the risk of urolithiasis, involving 247,531 participants. Analyses of all studies showed that DM was associated with an increased risk of urolithiasis (RR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.14-1.35). There was heterogeneity among studies (p=0.027, I2=57.9%). The association between DM and the risk of urolithiasis was not significantly differed by gender, but this association was inconsistent in the North American and Asian populations. When restricting the analysis to studies that had adjusted for body mass index (n=2) or hypertension (n=3), the RRs were 1.46 (95% CI: 1.03-2.06) and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.01-1.48), respectively. There was no significant publication bias (p=0.96 for Egger's regression asymmetry test). Our study provided evidence that there was a significant direct association of DM and the risk of urolithiasis. However, this finding was based on the observational studies, and more well-designed randomized controlled trials were needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.