Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25894624›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2015

Visualizing the pressure and time burden of intracranial hypertension in adult and paediatric traumatic brain injury.

Fabian Güiza, Bart Depreitere, Ian Piper, Giuseppe Citerio, Iain Chambers, Patricia A Jones, Tsz-Yan Milly Lo, Per Enblad, Pelle Nillson, Bart Feyen and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04459806 (Evaluation of Intracranial Pressure Time Dose by the New Integra CereLink ICP Monitor), which is not on this map. Cited by 157 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04459806 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Intracranial Pressure Time Dose by the New Integra CereLink ICP Monitor

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Milano BicoccaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled250ConditionsIntracranial Hypertension, Traumatic Brain Injury, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Intracranial HemorrhagesArmsintracranial pressure monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 339 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Fabian GüizaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Bart Depreitere
Ian Piper
Giuseppe Citerio
Iain Chambers
Patricia A Jones
Tsz-Yan Milly Lo
Per Enblad
Pelle Nillson
Bart Feyen
Philippe Jorens
Andrew Maas
Martin U Schuhmann
Rob Donald
Laura Moss
Greet Van den Berghe
Geert Meyfroidt
KU Leuven · BEAntwerp University Hospital · BERoyal Hospital for Children · GBUppsala University · SEAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITJames Cook University Hospital · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBSouthern General Hospital · GBUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DEUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the impact of the duration and intensity of episodes of increased intracranial pressure on 6-month neurological outcome in adult and paediatric traumatic brain injury.

methodsAnalysis of prospectively collected minute-by-minute intracranial pressure and mean arterial blood pressure data of 261 adult and 99 paediatric traumatic brain injury patients from multiple European centres. The relationship of episodes of elevated intracranial pressure (defined as a pressure above a certain threshold during a certain time) with 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale was visualized in a colour-coded plot.

resultsThe colour-coded plot illustrates the intuitive concept that episodes of higher intracranial pressure can only be tolerated for shorter durations: the curve that delineates the duration and intensity of those intracranial pressure episodes associated with worse outcome is an approximately exponential decay curve. In children, the curve resembles that of adults, but the delineation between episodes associated with worse outcome occurs at lower intracranial pressure thresholds. Intracranial pressures above 20 mmHg lasting longer than 37 min in adults, and longer than 8 min in children, are associated with worse outcomes. In a multivariate model, together with known baseline risk factors for outcome in severe traumatic brain injury, the cumulative intracranial pressure-time burden is independently associated with mortality. When cerebrovascular autoregulation, assessed with the low-frequency autoregulation index, is impaired, the ability to tolerate elevated intracranial pressures is reduced. When the cerebral perfusion pressure is below 50 mmHg, all intracranial pressure insults, regardless of duration, are associated with worse outcome.

conclusionsThe intracranial pressure-time burden associated with worse outcome is visualised in a colour-coded plot. In children, secondary injury occurs at lower intracranial pressure thresholds as compared to adults. Impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation reduces the ability to tolerate intracranial pressure insults. Thus, 50 mmHg might be the lower acceptable threshold for cerebral perfusion pressure.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArterial PressureAudiovisual AidsBrain InjuriesChildChild, PreschoolGlasgow Outcome ScaleHomeostasisHumansIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureMiddle AgedMonitoring, Physiologic

Identifiers

PMID25894624
OpenAlexW2049487312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.