ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2015
Patterns of relapse and growth kinetics of surgery- and radiation-refractory meningiomas.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D volume growth rate evaluation in the EORTC-BTG-1320 clinical trial for recurrent WHO grade 2 and 3 meningiomas.Neuro-oncology · 2024Trial
- Role of 3D volume growth rate for drug activity evaluation in meningioma clinical trials: the example of the CEVOREM study.Neuro-oncology · 2021Trial
- Prognostic role of extent of resection and adjuvant radiotherapy in de novo anaplastic meningiomas.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Grading meningioma resections: the Simpson classification and beyond.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Microsurgical Efficacy and Relapse of Rolandic Meningioma.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- De novo and secondary anaplastic meningiomas: a study of clinical and histomolecular prognostic factors.Neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- Effect of bevacizumab on refractory meningiomas: 3D volumetric growth rate versus response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with surgery- and radiation-refractory meningiomas have a poor outcome. Due to our lack of knowledge concerning multi-recurrent meningioma natural history, their clinical course is poorly defined. This retrospective study aims at defining patterns of relapse in order to help in the definition of response criteria in future clinical trials. We performed a retrospective review of surgery- and radiotherapy-refractory meningioma cases with interpretable radiological follow-up treated in our department. Tumor volumes were measured on 3D T1 Gadolinium volumetric sequences using a semi-automated algorithm for tumor segmentation. Twenty nine patients with multi-treated meningioma (11 WHO Grade II, 5 de novo WHO Grade III and 13 transformed WHO Grade III), were evaluated. Median PFS was 16 months for patients with Grade II meningiomas. In patients with Grade III meningiomas, the de novo subgroup had a median PFS of 4 months compared with 7 months in patients with malignant transformation. Volumetric analysis of tumor growth concerned 95 tumor nodules in 50 relapses. The mean growth rate of tumor nodules was 10.4 cm(3)/year (95% CI 7.3-14.8 cm(3)/year). Three patterns of tumor growth were described: "classical" for 9 (31%) patients, "local multi-nodular" for 6 (21%) patients and "multi-nodular metastatic" for the last 14 (48%) patients. Considering all tumor nodules, median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 3.7 months. Progressing tumors represent the most frequent histological subgroup of surgery and radiation-refractory meningiomas while tumors with multi-nodular metastatic dissemination are the prominent radiological pattern of progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.