Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25894594›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2015

Characterization of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: is histology the gold standard?

Isaac Melguizo-Gavilanes, Janet M Bruner, Nandita Guha-Thakurta, Kenneth R Hess, Vinay K Puduvalli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DEGRO practical guideline for central nervous system radiation necrosis part 1: classification and a multistep approach for diagnosis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Resolving spatial response heterogeneity in glioblastoma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Biomarkers of immunotherapy in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology practice · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. RANO 2.0: Update to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria for High- and Low-Grade Gliomas in Adults.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isaac Melguizo-GavilanesNeuro-Oncology Associates at Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA, isaac.melguizo@gmail.com.
Janet M Bruner
Nandita Guha-Thakurta
Kenneth R Hess
Vinay K Puduvalli
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTexas Oncology · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Patient Oriented Research Program in Neuro-oncologyK24CA160777 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI PUDUVALLI, VINAY K · 2012 to 2015
$580k
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA160777NCI NIH HHS K24CA160777NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudoprogression (psPD) refers to an increase in size or appearance of new areas of MRI contrast enhancement soon after completing chemoradiation, timely diagnosis of which has been a challenge. Given that tissue sampling of the MRI changes would be expected to accurately distinguish psPD from true progression when MRI changes are first seen, we examined the utility of surgery in diagnosing psPD and influencing patient outcome. We retrospectively reviewed data from adults with GBM who had MRI changes suggestive of progression within 3 months of chemoRT; of these, 34 underwent surgical resection. Three subsets-tumor, psPD or mixed-were identified based on histology and immunohistochemistry in the surgical group and by imaging characteristics in the nonsurgical group. A cohort of patients with stable disease post-chemoRT served as control. PFS and OS were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank analysis. Concordance for psPD between radiological interpretation and subsequent histological diagnosis was seen in only 32% of cases (11/34) 95%CI 19-49%. A large proportion of patients had a histologically "mixed" pattern with tumor and treatment effect. No significant differences in PFS or OS were seen among the three subtypes. Surgical sampling and histologic review of MRI changes after chemoRT may not serve as a gold standard to distinguish psPD from true progression in GBM patients. Refinement of the histological criteria, careful intraoperative selection of regions of interest and advanced imaging modalities are needed for early differentiation of PsPD from progression to guide clinical management.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID25894594
PMCPMC4780341
OpenAlexW2087201765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.