Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25894579›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Maximum-likelihood method identifies meiotic restitution mechanism from heterozygosity transmission of centromeric loci: application in citrus.

José Cuenca, Pablo Aleza, José Juárez, Andrés García-Lor, Yann Froelicher, Luis Navarro, Patrick Ollitrault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Preferential Disomic Segregation andFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  8. Synthetic Polyploidy in Grafted Crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The evolution of meiotic sex and its alternatives.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

José CuencaCrop Protection and Biotechnology Center. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA).
Pablo AlezaCrop Protection and Biotechnology Center. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA).
José JuárezCrop Protection and Biotechnology Center. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA).
Andrés García-LorCrop Protection and Biotechnology Center. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA).
Yann FroelicherCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD).
Luis NavarroCrop Protection and Biotechnology Center. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA).
Patrick Ollitrault1] Crop Protection and Biotechnology Center. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA) [2] Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyploidisation is a key source of diversification and speciation in plants. Most researchers consider sexual polyploidisation leading to unreduced gamete as its main origin. Unreduced gametes are useful in several crop breeding schemes. Their formation mechanism, i.e., First-Division Restitution (FDR) or Second-Division Restitution (SDR), greatly impacts the gametic and population structures and, therefore, the breeding efficiency. Previous methods to identify the underlying mechanism required the analysis of a large set of markers over large progeny. This work develops a new maximum-likelihood method to identify the unreduced gamete formation mechanism both at the population and individual levels using independent centromeric markers. Knowledge of marker-centromere distances greatly improves the statistical power of the comparison between the SDR and FDR hypotheses. Simulating data demonstrated the importance of selecting markers very close to the centromere to obtain significant conclusions at individual level. This new method was used to identify the meiotic restitution mechanism in nineteen mandarin genotypes used as female parents in triploid citrus breeding. SDR was identified for 85.3% of 543 triploid hybrids and FDR for 0.6%. No significant conclusions were obtained for 14.1% of the hybrids. At population level SDR was the predominant mechanisms for the 19 parental mandarins.

Indexed as

MeiosisAllelesCentromereChromosomes, PlantCitrusCrosses, GeneticGenotypeGerm Cells, PlantHeterozygoteLikelihood FunctionsPlant BreedingPolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID25894579
PMCPMC4403285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.