Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25894390›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A powerful statistical approach for large-scale differential transcription analysis.

Yuan-De Tan, Anita M Chandler, Arindam Chaudhury, Joel R Neilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuan-De TanDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics and Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America.
Anita M ChandlerDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics and Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America.
Arindam ChaudhuryDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics and Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America.
Joel R NeilsonDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics and Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America.

Funding

Tissue ResourceP50CA126752 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MALCOLM K. BRENNER, HELEN E HESLOP · 2007 to 2026
$51.4M
Translational control of EMT by the CELF1 RNA Binding ProteinR01CA190467 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI NEILSON, JOEL R · 2015 to 2021
$1.9M
Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Polycistronic MicroRNAs in Mammalian CellsR00CA131474 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI NEILSON, JOEL R · 2009 to 2011
$740k
Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Polycistronic MicroRNAs in Mammalian CellsK99CA131474 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI NEILSON, JOEL R · 2008 to 2009
$233k
NCI NIH HHS CA126752NCI NIH HHS CA131474NCI NIH HHS K99 CA131474NCI NIH HHS P50 CA126752NCI NIH HHS R00 CA131474NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly being used for transcriptome-wide analysis of differential gene expression. The NGS data are multidimensional count data. Therefore, most of the statistical methods developed well for microarray data analysis are not applicable to transcriptomic data. For this reason, a variety of new statistical methods based on count data of transcript reads have been correspondingly proposed. But due to high cost and limitation of biological resources, current NGS data are still generated from a few replicate libraries. Some of these existing methods do not always have desirable performances on count data. We here developed a very powerful and robust statistical method based on beta and binomial distributions. Our method (mBeta t-test) is specifically applicable to sequence count data from small samples. Both simulated and real transcriptomic data showed mBeta t-test significantly outperformed the existing top statistical methods chosen in all 12 given scenarios and performed with high efficiency and high stability. The differentially expressed genes found by our method from real transcriptomic data were validated by qPCR experiments. Our method shows high power in finding truly differential expression, conservatively estimating FDR and high stability in RNA sequence count data derived from small samples. Our method can also be extended to genome-wide detection of differential splicing events.

Indexed as

Statistics as TopicAnimalsComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingHumansJurkat CellsMiceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsRNA, MessengerROC CurveRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25894390
PMCPMC4404056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.