Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25894314›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Optional Endoreplication and Selective Elimination of Parental Genomes during Oogenesis in Diploid and Triploid Hybrid European Water Frogs.

Dmitry Dedukh, Spartak Litvinchuk, Juriy Rosanov, Glib Mazepa, Alsu Saifitdinova, Dmitry Shabanov, Alla Krasikova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Delete and survive: strategies of programmed genetic material elimination in eukaryotes.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dmitry DedukhSaint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Spartak LitvinchukInstitute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Juriy RosanovInstitute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Glib MazepaDepartment of Ecology and Genetic, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Alsu SaifitdinovaSaint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Dmitry ShabanovV.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Alla KrasikovaSaint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
St Petersburg University · RUInstitute of Cytology · RUV. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incompatibilities between parental genomes decrease viability of interspecific hybrids; however, deviations from canonical gametogenesis such as genome endoreplication and elimination can rescue hybrid organisms. To evaluate frequency and regularity of genome elimination and endoreplication during gametogenesis in hybrid animals with different ploidy, we examined genome composition in oocytes of di- and triploid hybrid frogs of the Pelophylax esculentus complex. Obtained results allowed us to suggest that during oogenesis the endoreplication involves all genomes occurring before the selective genome elimination. We accepted the hypothesis that only elimination of one copied genome occurs premeiotically in most of triploid hybrid females. At the same time, we rejected the hypothesis stating that the genome of parental species hybrid frogs co-exist with is always eliminated during oogenesis in diploid hybrids. Diploid hybrid frogs demonstrate an enlarged frequency of deviations in oogenesis comparatively to triploid hybrids. Typical for hybrid frogs deviations in gametogenesis increase variability of produced gametes and provide a mechanism for appearance of different forms of hybrids.

Indexed as

DiploidyGenomeHybridization, GeneticTriploidyAnimalsBase SequenceChromosomesEndoreduplicationFemaleGenotypeOocytesOogenesisRanidaeRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID25894314
PMCPMC4403867
OpenAlexW2088617577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.