Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25894063›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2015

Establishing a common metric for self-reported pain: linking BPI Pain Interference and SF-36 Bodily Pain Subscale scores to the PROMIS Pain Interference metric.

Karon F Cook, Benjamin D Schalet, Michael A Kallen, Joshua P Rutsohn, David Cella

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Are OMERACT recommendations followed in clinical trials on fibromyalgia? A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes and their measures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mapping and Linking between the EQ-5D-5L and the PROMIS Domains in the United States.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sleep quality in cancer patients: a common metric for several instruments measuring sleep quality.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Measuring PROMIS pain interference in German patients with chronic conditions: calibration, validation, and cross-cultural use of item parameters.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mapping PROMIS physical function and pain interference to the modified low back pain disability questionnaire.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karon F CookDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 27th Floor, Chicago, IL, USA. karon.cook@northwestern.edu.
Benjamin D SchaletDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 27th Floor, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael A KallenDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 27th Floor, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joshua P RutsohnDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 27th Floor, Chicago, IL, USA.
David CellaDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 Michigan Ave, 27th Floor, Chicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniela E Matei · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
The National Person-Centered Assessment Resource (PCAR)U2CCA186878 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GERSHON, RICHARD · 2014 to 2018
$11.9M
PROsetta StoneRC4CA157236 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CELLA, DAVID · 2010 to 2010
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553NCI NIH HHS RC4 CA157236NCI NIH HHS RC4CA157236NCI NIH HHS U2C CA186878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study purposes were to mathematically link scores of the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Subscale and the Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Subscale (legacy pain interference measures) to the NIH Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) metric and evaluate results.

methodsLinking was accomplished using both equipercentile and item response theory (IRT) methods. Item parameters for legacy items were estimated on the PROMIS-PI metric to allow for pattern scoring. Crosswalk tables also were developed that associated raw scores (summed or average) on legacy measures to PROMIS-PI scores. For each linking strategy, participants' actual PROMIS-PI scores were compared to those predicted based on their legacy scores. To assess the impact of different sample sizes, we conducted random resampling with replacement across 10,000 replications with sample sizes of n = 25, 50, and 75.

resultsAnalyses supported the assumption that all three scales were measuring similar constructs. IRT methods produced marginally better results than equipercentile linking. Accuracy of the links was substantially affected by sample size.

conclusionsThe linking tools (crosswalks and item parameter estimates) developed in this study are robust methods for estimating the PROMIS-PI scores of samples based on legacy measures. We recommend using pattern scoring for users who have the necessary software and score crosswalks for those who do not.

Indexed as

Self ReportAdultAgedFemaleHumansInformation SystemsMaleMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementPatientsPsychometricsQuality of LifeSample SizeSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesInstrument calibration/equivalency among scalesItem response theoryPainPain measurementPatient outcome assessmentPsychometric methods/scaling

Identifiers

PMID25894063
PMCPMC4567433
OpenAlexW2060150796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.