Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25894061›Full record

Trial reportQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2015

A longitudinal assessment of the responsiveness of the ICECAP-A in a randomised controlled trial of a knee pain intervention.

T Keeley, H Al-Janabi, E Nicholls, N E Foster, S Jowett, J Coast

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Braving the waves: exploring capability well-being patterns in seven European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Measurement properties of the ICECAP-A capability well-being instrument among dermatological patients.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Estimating the monetary value of health and capability well-being applying the well-being valuation approach.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  13. Capability instruments in economic evaluations of health-related interventions: a comparative review of the literature.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Review
  14. Happy with Your Capabilities? Valuing ICECAP-O and ICECAP-A States Based on Experienced Utility Using Subjective Well-Being Data.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020
    Article
  15. Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T KeeleyMRC Midland Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. T.J.H.Keeley@bham.ac.uk.
H Al-JanabiHealth Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
E NichollsArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
N E FosterArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
S JowettHealth Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
J CoastMRC Midland Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
University of Birmingham · GBKeele University · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 18139Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-015Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10386Medical Research Council G0701027Medical Research Council G0800808Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe ICECAP-A is a simple measure of capability well-being for use with the adult population. The descriptive system is made up of five key attributes: Stability, Attachment, Autonomy, Achievement and Enjoyment. Studies have begun to assess the psychometric properties of the measure, including the construct and content validity and feasibility for use. This is the first study to use longitudinal data to assess the responsiveness of the measure.

methodsThis responsiveness study was completed alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing three physiotherapy-led exercise interventions for older adults with knee pain attributable to osteoarthritis. Anchor-based methodologies were used to explore the relationship between change over time in ICECAP-A score (the target measure) and change over time in another measure (the anchor). Analyses were completed using the non-value-weighted and value-weighted ICECAP-A scores. The EQ-5D-3L was used as a comparator measure to contextualise change in the ICECAP-A. Effect sizes, standardised response means and t tests were used to quantify responsiveness.

resultsSmall changes in the ICECAP-A scores were seen in response to underlying changes in patients' health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression. Non-weighted scores were slightly more responsive than value-weighted scores. ICECAP-A change was of comparable size to change in the EQ-5D-3L reference measure.

conclusionThis first analysis of the responsiveness using longitudinal data provides some positive evidence for the responsiveness of the ICECAP-A measure. There is a need for further research in those with low health and capability, and experiencing larger underlying changes in quality of life.

Indexed as

Sickness Impact ProfileAgedAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKneeLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritisPainPatientsPsychometricsCapabilityICECAP-APsychometricsResponsiveness

Identifiers

PMID25894061
PMCPMC4564441
OpenAlexW2057044110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.