Erratum to: The impacts of severe perfusion defects, akinetic/dyskinetic segments, and viable myocardium on the accuracy of volumes and LVEF measured by gated (99m)Tc-MIBI SPECT and gated (18)F-FDG PET in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as the reference.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

1. Summed thickening score by myocardial perfusion imaging: A risk factor of left ventricular remodeling in patients with myocardial infarction.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  The impacts of severe perfusion defects, akinetic/dyskinetic segments, and viable myocardium on the accuracy of volumes and LVEF measured by gated ⁹⁹mTc-MIBI SPECT and gated ¹⁸F-FDG PET in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as the reference.2014

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.