ArticlePloS one2015
A Nonlinear Mixed Effects Approach for Modeling the Cell-To-Cell Variability of Mig1 Dynamics in Yeast.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic mode decomposition for analysis and prediction of metabolic oscillations from time-lapse imaging of cellular autofluorescence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Gradient matching accelerates mixed-effects inference for biochemical networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Mathematical Modeling and Inference of Epidermal Growth Factor-Induced Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cell Signaling Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Exploring carbon source related localization and phosphorylation in the Snf1/Mig1 network using population and single cell-based approaches.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2024Article
- Modeling Cellular Signaling Variability Based on Single-Cell Data: The TGFβ-SMAD Signaling Pathway.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Review
- Live cell microscopy: From image to insight.Biophysics reviews · 2022Review
- Scalable and flexible inference framework for stochastic dynamic single-cell models.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Systematic inference identifies a major source of heterogeneity in cell signaling dynamics: The rate-limiting step number.Science advances · 2022Article
- Modelling of glucose repression signalling in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.FEMS yeast research · 2022Review
- Modeling and characterization of inter-individual variability in CD8 T cell responses in mice.In silico biology · 2021Article
- Fine-Tuning of Energy Levels RegulatesFrontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Multi-experiment nonlinear mixed effect modeling of single-cell translation kinetics after transfection.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2019Article
- Single-cell study links metabolism with nutrient signaling and reveals sources of variability.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
- Stochastic models of gene transcription with upstream drives: exact solution and sample path characterization.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Article
- What Population Reveals about Individual Cell Identity: Single-Cell Parameter Estimation of Models of Gene Expression in Yeast.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- New Insights into Tree Height Distribution Based on Mixed Effects Univariate Diffusion Processes.PloS one · 2016Article
- Correction: a nonlinear mixed effects approach for modeling the cell-to-cell variability of Mig1 dynamics in yeast.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The last decade has seen a rapid development of experimental techniques that allow data collection from individual cells. These techniques have enabled the discovery and characterization of variability within a population of genetically identical cells. Nonlinear mixed effects (NLME) modeling is an established framework for studying variability between individuals in a population, frequently used in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, but its potential for studies of cell-to-cell variability in molecular cell biology is yet to be exploited. Here we take advantage of this novel application of NLME modeling to study cell-to-cell variability in the dynamic behavior of the yeast transcription repressor Mig1. In particular, we investigate a recently discovered phenomenon where Mig1 during a short and transient period exits the nucleus when cells experience a shift from high to intermediate levels of extracellular glucose. A phenomenological model based on ordinary differential equations describing the transient dynamics of nuclear Mig1 is introduced, and according to the NLME methodology the parameters of this model are in turn modeled by a multivariate probability distribution. Using time-lapse microscopy data from nearly 200 cells, we estimate this parameter distribution according to the approach of maximizing the population likelihood. Based on the estimated distribution, parameter values for individual cells are furthermore characterized and the resulting Mig1 dynamics are compared to the single cell times-series data. The proposed NLME framework is also compared to the intuitive but limited standard two-stage (STS) approach. We demonstrate that the latter may overestimate variabilities by up to almost five fold. Finally, Monte Carlo simulations of the inferred population model are used to predict the distribution of key characteristics of the Mig1 transient response. We find that with decreasing levels of post-shift glucose, the transient response of Mig1 tend to be faster, more extended, and displays an increased cell-to-cell variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.